Motorized Reel Firefighter Training Unit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Firefighter training is limited by the high cost and limited versatility of existing training equipment, which struggles to recreate realistic scenarios safely and efficiently, often requiring significant manpower and resources.

Innovation Solution

A firefighter training unit with a reel, user-manipulable nozzle, and motorized hose system that simulates the use of a fire extinguishing system, including devices for controlling liquid flow rate, spray pattern, and nozzle actuation, along with a controller that applies torque to mimic operational forces, and optional features like image capture and pressurization to enhance realism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If expensive hot fire training props are used to recreate realistic fire scenarios, then training realism is improved, but training cost increases and versatility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining realismVSAvoidscenario variety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The training system uses a single configurable prop that can simulate multiple different fire scenarios by adjusting parameters such as heat generation, smoke production, and structural response. This allows the same physical prop to recreate various building types (residential, commercial, industrial) and fire conditions, eliminating the need for multiple specialized props while maintaining training realism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs configurable parameters that can be adjusted to change the prop's behavior and characteristics. By modifying parameters such as temperature, smoke density, structural stability, and material properties, the same prop can safely simulate different fire intensities and environmental conditions that would otherwise require multiple different props.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple specialized training props are acquired to cover different fire scenarios, then scenario variety is improved, but equipment cost and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario varietyVSAvoidequipment quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of acquiring multiple specialized props for different fire scenarios, the system implements a single universal prop with configurable characteristics. This prop can be programmed and adjusted to represent various building types, fire loads, and environmental conditions, thereby providing comprehensive scenario variety without requiring additional physical equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The training prop incorporates dynamic and adjustable features that allow its properties to be changed during or between training sessions. This dynamic configurability enables the same physical structure to adapt to different training requirements, replacing the need for multiple static props designed for specific scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If significant manpower is deployed to operate training vehicles and equipment, then training support capability is improved, but operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining support capabilityVSAvoidmanpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The training system incorporates self-contained features where the prop generates its own environmental conditions (heat, smoke, structural responses) without requiring external support vehicles or extensive manual operation. This self-service capability reduces the need for additional personnel to operate pumpers, generators, or other support equipment while maintaining training support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical support systems (such as pumpers and manual equipment operation) with automated or electronically controlled mechanisms integrated into the prop itself. This substitution reduces the manpower required to operate support equipment while maintaining or enhancing the quality of training support provided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If simplified training equipment is used to reduce cost and complexity, then ease of deployment is improved, but training realism decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidsimulation realism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a single integrated prop that combines multiple training functions and realistic features in one deployable unit. This universal prop includes built-in capabilities for heat generation, smoke production, structural simulation, and environmental control, providing high training realism without requiring complex assembly or multiple separate equipment pieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The prop incorporates configurable parameters that can be adjusted to achieve different levels of realism and training scenarios. This allows the system to be deployed with appropriate realism settings for different training objectives, maintaining ease of deployment while enabling high-fidelity simulation when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a cost-effective, adaptable, and highly realistic training experience, reducing the need for expensive props and manpower while simulating the physical demands of firefighting in various scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

a controller configured to drive the motor in response to the one or more output signals so as to apply torque to the reel in the second rotational direction to simulate forces applied to the hose during operation of the fire extinguishing system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 2

the firefighter training unit further includes electrical cabling extending within the tube between the one or more devices and the controller, for the purpose of transmitting data between the one or more devices and the controller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurisation: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentEP3259748B1Firefighter training unit
Publication Date: 2020.07.29 FLAIM SYST PTY LTD
  • EP3259748B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3259748B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3259748B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A firefighter training unit for simulating use of a fire extinguishing system, the unit including: a reel; a user-manipulable nozzle; a hose having opposite ends attached respectively to the reel and the nozzle and being partially wound around the reel, wherein rotation of the reel in a first rotational direction allows the hose to be unwound from the reel; a motor configured to drive the reel in a second rotational direction which causes the hose to be wound onto the reel; one or more devices for providing one or more output signals corresponding to one or more simulated operating conditions of the fire extinguishing system; and a controller configured to drive the motor in response to the one or more output signals so as to apply torque to the reel in the second rotational direction to simulate forces applied to the hose during operation of the fire extinguishing system.