Motorized Strut Feedback for Load-Balanced Bone Frame Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spatial frames for bone fracture treatment require manual strut adjustments, leading to patient compliance issues, uneven loading, and inaccurate healing assessments, resulting in prolonged healing times and potential complications.

Innovation Solution

Implementing motorized struts with geared-motor assemblies and processing components that monitor loading parameters, adjust struts autonomously, and utilize machine-learning for precise healing predictions, reducing manual intervention and enhancing treatment accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If motorized struts with feedback systems are implemented, then treatment accuracy and healing prediction improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealing prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where motors monitor their own loading conditions and provide this information to a control system. This feedback enables the system to detect healing status, adjust treatment parameters, and predict outcomes, thereby improving measurement precision and healing prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The motorized struts are designed to self-monitor their loading conditions and automatically provide data to the control system without requiring external intervention. This self-service capability reduces the need for manual assessment while improving the accuracy of healing predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If frequent strut adjustments are made to optimize healing, then healing time is reduced, but risk of hardware damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealing timeVSAvoidhardware durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The loading monitoring system provides real-time feedback on strut conditions, allowing the control system to determine the optimal timing for adjustments. This feedback mechanism enables frequent adjustments when needed while avoiding adjustments that could damage hardware by monitoring actual loading conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of loading conditions before making adjustments, allowing the control system to plan adjustments in advance based on predicted healing status. This preliminary action enables timing adjustments to occur at optimal moments that promote healing while minimizing hardware stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If manual strut adjustments are used, then device complexity is reduced, but patient compliance becomes a limiting factor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidpatient compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The motorized struts automatically perform adjustments based on programmed treatment plans and real-time loading conditions, eliminating the need for patient compliance with manual adjustments. The system self-regulates the treatment process while maintaining simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual adjustment system with an automated motorized system that uses electrical control to perform strut adjustments. This substitution eliminates patient compliance requirements while maintaining relative simplicity through standard motor control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If loading monitoring is implemented, then treatment optimization improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading measurement accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motors monitor their own loading conditions using their existing motor controllers and available sensors, eliminating the need for separate dedicated monitoring systems. This self-service approach improves loading measurement accuracy while minimizing additional energy consumption by utilizing existing system resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260108275A1Motorized strut motor feedback
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 SMITH & NEPHEW INC
  • US20260108275A1 patent drawing
  • US20260108275A1 patent drawing
  • US20260108275A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A spatial frame apparatus for positioning on a patient to treat an injury. The apparatus includes a frame having one or more motorized struts. One or more motorized struts include one or more motors configured to cause movement of one or more motorized struts in one or more directions in accordance with one or more treatment plans. The apparatus includes one or more processing 2024/102351 components communicatively coupled to one or more motorized struts and/or one or more motors. One or more processing components determine one or more loading parameters on the one or more motorized struts. The loading parameters define loading on the one or more motorized struts resulting from the frame being positioned and/or adjusted on the patient. The processing components execute at least one adjustment of one or more motorized struts based on the determined loading parameters.