Motorized Tailgate Holding Mode for Manual Closure Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor vehicle tailgates lack secure closure mechanisms, particularly in modern vehicles without handles, leading to risks of jamming and false lock signals affecting systems like theft warnings and tail lamp functions, and existing solutions are complex or costly.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a control unit that activates a holding mode by detecting a predetermined actuation sequence and manual closing movement, short-circuiting the motor to secure the tailgate, accompanied by visual and auditory feedback, and allowing manual override.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the tailgate lock is used as the only fastening point in modern vehicles without handles, then the structure is simplified, but the risk of jamming and false lock signals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetailgate structureVSAvoidlock signal accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (the actuator with actuating element) between the user's closing action and the lock system. This intermediary detects the manual closing movement through the actuating element and triggers the actuator to activate the lock, providing a buffer that prevents direct contact between closing aids and the lock, thereby reducing jamming risk while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the actuator to detect the state of the actuating element and automatically activate the lock when manual closing is detected. This feedback mechanism ensures that the lock is activated only when properly closed, preventing false lock signals while maintaining reliability without requiring handles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual closing aids (bicycle cords, ties) are used to secure the tailgate, then the tailgate can be secured against reopening, but the risk of jamming the lock increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetailgate securingVSAvoidjamming risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator serves as an intermediary that detects manual closing movements through the actuating element. This allows users to secure the tailgate with closing aids while the actuator mediates between these aids and the lock system, triggering the lock only when proper closing is detected, thereby preventing jamming while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical interaction between closing aids and the lock with an electrical/detector-based system. The actuator with its actuating element detects the closing state and triggers the lock electrically, substituting the mechanical coupling that causes jamming with a sensor-based activation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the actuating element is actuated for a predetermined period or sequence, then the holding mode can be activated to secure the tailgate, but the operation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetailgate closure securityVSAvoidactuation operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system requires preliminary action by detecting a predetermined actuation sequence or duration before activating holding mode. This preliminary detection ensures that the user intentionally initiates the closing sequence, preventing accidental activation while maintaining ease of operation through a simple, predictable pattern recognition system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator automatically detects the actuation sequence and activates the lock without requiring additional user input or complex manual operations. The system serves itself by interpreting the actuation pattern and automatically triggering the appropriate response, simplifying the overall operation while ensuring reliable closure security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a cost-effective and user-friendly solution to secure tailgate closure, reducing risks of jamming and false lock signals while enhancing customer convenience.

Implementation Method 1

a control unit ascertains whether the actuating element is actuated for a predetermined period of time or by a predetermined actuation sequence and at the same time a manual closing movement of the tailgate is effected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition detection:

Implementation Method 2

the motor is short-circuited in the holding mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical short-circuiting:

Data Source

PatentUS20250223859A1Method for operating a motor-actuatable tailgate of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH

AI summary

In a method for operating a motor-actuatable tailgate of a motor vehicle, the motor of which can be activated or deactivated controlledly by actuation of an actuating element of an operating element, a control unit ascertains whether the actuating element is actuated for a predetermined period of time or by a predetermined actuation sequence and at the same time a manual closing movement of the tailgate is effected. If so, a holding mode is activated on reaching the tailgate position at which the actuating element is no longer actuated, wherein the motor is short-circuited in the holding mode.