Mounting Head Disturbance Compensation Using Acceleration Commands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing disturbance non-interference-enabling compensation devices are affected by mechanical characteristics like frictional force and control delays, leading to complex configurations and high CPU calculation loads, and are unable to accurately compensate for disturbances in moving body driving systems due to reliance on operation amounts rather than acceleration commands.

Innovation Solution

A two-degree-of-freedom control system that includes a detecting section, feedback and feedforward compensators, and a disturbance non-interference-enabling compensator with a second-order differentiator and multipliers to correct operation amounts based on acceleration command values, reducing the influence of mechanical characteristics and simplifying the compensation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If feedforward compensator is constructed using inverse characteristic of nominal model with second-order differential, then disturbance compensation is achieved, but the configuration becomes complicated and CPU calculation load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisturbance compensation accuracyVSAvoidcompensator configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts only the essential acceleration command value from the operation amount, separating it from feedback compensation components. By using a second-order differentiator to obtain acceleration command values directly from position command values, the system eliminates the need for complex inverse characteristic calculations while maintaining disturbance compensation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter used for disturbance compensation from operation amount (which includes feedback compensation) to acceleration command value (obtained through second-order differentiation). This parameter change simplifies the compensator configuration by removing the need for complex inverse model calculations while preserving the ability to compensate for disturbances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If operation amount including feedback compensation is used for disturbance compensation, then compensation is performed, but mechanical characteristics like frictional force affect the compensation accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisturbance compensation accuracyVSAvoidcompensation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the acceleration command value from the operation amount by using second-order differentiation of position command values. This extraction removes the feedback compensation components that are affected by mechanical characteristics like friction, leaving only the pure acceleration information needed for accurate disturbance compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the operation amount into its constituent parts by using second-order differentiation to isolate the acceleration command value. This segmentation separates the feedforward acceleration component from the feedback compensation components, allowing disturbance compensation to be performed using only the acceleration information without contamination from frictional force compensations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If feedback control is used to reduce relative displacement, then positioning accuracy improves, but control delay prevents effective disturbance compensation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidcontrol delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary action by calculating the acceleration command value from position command values before the disturbance occurs. By using second-order differentiation of the position command values, the system obtains acceleration information in advance, allowing disturbance compensation to be applied proactively rather than reactively, thus eliminating the negative impact of control delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11277951B2Disturbance compensation system for moving bodies of a mounting head of component mounting apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 FUJI CORP
  • US11277951B2 patent drawing
  • US11277951B2 patent drawing
  • US11277951B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A positioning control device controlling multiple moving bodies including a disturbance non-interference-enabling compensator performing non-interference-enabling compensation of a disturbance of an feedback compensator and an operation amount of the moving body on the side affected by the disturbance is provided. The disturbance non-interference-enabling compensator includes a second differentiator to perform second-order differentiation of a position command value of a moving body on a disturbance generating side to output an acceleration command value; a first multiplier to multiply an acceleration command value output from the second differentiator by a first gain to output a correction amount of an feedback compensator of the moving body on the side affected by the disturbance; and a second multiplier to multiply an acceleration command value output from the second differentiator by a second gain to output a correction amount for an operation amount of the moving body on the side affected by the disturbance.