Mouse Trap Latch Trigger Curved Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mouse traps face issues with inconsistent latching mechanisms, leading to accidental releases and failure to trigger when a mouse contacts the trap, due to variability in latching security.

Innovation Solution

A mouse trap design featuring a rectangular base with a transverse midpoint, a swinging striker biased by a helical spring, a trigger with recesses for bait and extra mass at the distal end, and a latch with a groove for precise engagement with the trigger, ensuring consistent latching and increased likelihood of trigger release upon mouse contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the latching mechanism is made more secure, then reliability of latching is improved, but the striker may not release when a mouse contacts the trigger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching securityVSAvoidtrigger release
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the latch and trigger components. Specifically, the latch has a curved surface that contacts a corresponding curved surface on the trigger, creating a defined mechanical interface. The latch arm length, curvature radius, and contact point positions are optimized to achieve consistent latching force while maintaining reliable release when the trigger is depressed by a mouse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The latching mechanism transitions from a static connection to a dynamic one where the latch can pivot smoothly between latched and unlatched positions. The curved contact surfaces enable controlled motion and force distribution, allowing the system to adapt between the two extreme states (securely latched vs. easily released) based on the applied force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the latching mechanism is made less secure, then trigger release is improved, but accidental releases increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrigger releaseVSAvoidlatching security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the geometric parameters including the latch arm length, curvature radius of contact surfaces, and position of the pivot point. These parameters are designed to create a latching force sufficient to prevent accidental releases during normal handling, while still allowing easy release when a mouse contacts the trigger.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The curved contact surfaces act as intermediaries between the latch and trigger, distributing forces smoothly and providing a controlled mechanical interface. This intermediary mechanism ensures that small forces (accidental touches) do not cause release, while larger forces (mouse contact) reliably trigger release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the latch position is adjusted closer to the trigger, then trigger release is improved, but latching security decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrigger releaseVSAvoidlatching security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent precisely determines the optimal position of the latch relative to the trigger through geometric parameter optimization. The curved contact surfaces are positioned at specific distances and angles to achieve the desired balance between latching security and trigger release reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the latch position is adjusted farther from the trigger, then latching security is improved, but trigger release reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching securityVSAvoidtrigger release
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the distance between the latch and trigger by adjusting geometric parameters such as the latch arm length and curvature radius. This ensures that even when the latch is positioned to provide strong latching security, the trigger can still be reliably released when a mouse contacts it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The improved mouse trap achieves consistent latching and reduced accidental releases, while ensuring the striker is more likely to swing onto the mouse when triggered, addressing the variability and reliability issues of existing designs.

Implementation Method 1

a helical spring attached to the base at the midpoint biasing the striker toward the unarmed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10524464B1Mouse trap
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 COOK PAUL F
  • US10524464B1 patent drawing
  • US10524464B1 patent drawing
  • US10524464B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mouse trap has a spring-loaded striker that is released when the mouse depresses a trigger. The trigger with has recesses near the distal end of the trigger and has a latch having an enlargement at its distal end. The enlargement contains a groove that engages a lower corner of the trigger when the mouse trap is armed.