Movable Blade Arrowhead Design for Flight Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional blade-opening arrow heads face issues with undesirable aerodynamic steering due to exposed blades during flight, compromised structural integrity from reduced blade surface area, complex and unreliable mechanisms, and the need for consumable retaining rings that can fail or require frequent replacement.

Innovation Solution

An arrow head design with two types of pivotally mounted blades that remain frictionally locked during flight and quickly open upon impact, utilizing bias elements like springs to maintain closed positions without consumable components such as O-rings or bands, ensuring balanced and effective cutting upon target penetration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If blades are exposed during flight to provide cutting area, then cutting effectiveness is improved, but aerodynamic steering and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting effectivenessVSAvoidflight stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements movable blades that dynamically change position between closed (retracted) during flight and open (extended) upon impact. This dynamic configuration allows the arrowhead to maintain flight stability with blades retracted while providing cutting effectiveness when blades are extended at the moment of target contact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The arrowhead is segmented into multiple independent movable blades (typically three) that can operate independently within their own slots. Each blade is separately mounted on a pivot pin and can be individually retained by friction-fit retaining rings, allowing independent control and operation of each cutting element

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If blade surface area is reduced to minimize aerodynamic steering, then flight stability is improved, but structural integrity and cutting area deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight stabilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The blades are designed to be retracted into the ferrule body during flight, minimizing exposed surface area to reduce aerodynamic steering. Upon impact, the blades extend outward to provide full cutting surface area. This dynamic retraction/extension eliminates the need to compromise blade dimensions for flight stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If conventional annular retaining rings are used to maintain closed position, then blade retention is achieved, but reliability and ease of operation deteriorate due to cracking, premature opening, and replacement needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade retention forceVSAvoidmechanism reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the retaining function from conventional annular O-rings and implements it through friction-fit retaining rings that are press-fit into slots within the ferrule body. These retained rings engage with the movable blades through friction, providing reliable retention without the cracking and deterioration issues of elastomeric materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The friction-fit retaining rings are designed to be self-retaining through interference fit within the ferrule slots. The friction force between the retaining ring and slot walls provides the necessary retention force without requiring additional active retention mechanisms, and the rings are designed to last the lifetime of the arrowhead without replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If complex mechanisms are used to control blade opening, then blade control is achieved, but device complexity and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade controlVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade control mechanism uses simple pivotal movement within slots rather than complex linkages. Each blade rotates on a pivot pin mounted in the ferrule, allowing smooth transition between retracted and extended positions. The bias element provides automatic return force to the retracted position without requiring complex spring mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Force

If bias elements like springs are used to maintain closed position, then blade retention is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade retention forceVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bias element is localized to a simple spring mechanism positioned at the base of each blade's slot, providing the necessary retention force only where needed. This localized approach maintains blade control without requiring complex distributed mechanisms throughout the arrowhead structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces aerodynamic steering effects, maintains structural integrity, eliminates the need for consumable components, and enhances safety and cost-effectiveness by ensuring reliable blade operation without premature opening or failure.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing bias elements like springs to maintain closed positions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

blades that remain frictionally locked during flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10837743B1Arrow head with movable blades
Publication Date: 2020.11.17 GOOD SPORTSMAN MARKETING LLC
  • US10837743B1 patent drawing
  • US10837743B1 patent drawing
  • US10837743B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrow head having two different movable blades with at least one blade interchangeably mounted in a pivotal or a fixed position with respect to a blade carrying body and a second blade that moves between a flight position and an impact position. A shaft is used to retain a corresponding blade in a pivotal or a fixed position with respect to a blade carrying body. When the blade is pivotally mounted, a bias force of a retaining member is preferably selected so that each blade remains in a normally closed position during flight of the arrow head and can quickly move to a fully open position upon impact or when a sufficient opening force is applied to the arrow head.