Movable Bottom Reflector for Blow Molding Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current heating devices for blow molding machines are inefficient in terms of power usage, particularly when heating preforms of different sizes, leading to increased operational costs and suboptimal energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A heating device with a movable bottom reflector relative to a counter reflector, allowing for optimal positioning and reflection of heat radiation, along with a setting device to adjust the reflector's position based on preform length, enhancing energy efficiency and reducing changeover time between different preform sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a universal setting of heating modules is used to heat preforms of different sizes, then the heating device can accommodate various preform sizes, but the power efficiency deteriorates especially when heating shorter preforms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to heat preforms of different sizesVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heating device employs movable reflectors that can be dynamically adjusted to different positions depending on the preform length. This dynamic adjustment allows the heating zones to be optimized for each preform size, ensuring that energy is concentrated where needed and preventing energy waste on areas beyond the preform extent, thus resolving the contradiction between versatility and energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device changes the spatial parameters of the heating system by adjusting the positions of reflectors and heating elements. By modifying these parameters according to preform length, the system maintains optimal energy distribution across different preform sizes, preventing energy loss while accommodating various sizes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the same energy amount is consumed for heating all preforms of different sizes, then the heating device simplifies its control system, but the operational costs increase due to suboptimal energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating control systemVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The heating device incorporates a control system that receives feedback about preform length and automatically adjusts the reflector positions and heating parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the system to optimize energy consumption for each preform size without requiring complex manual intervention, balancing automation benefits with energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts heating parameters based on detected preform characteristics, allowing energy consumption to match actual heating requirements. This dynamic control prevents unnecessary energy expenditure while maintaining straightforward operational procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If fixed holders are used for reflectors and heat sources, then the device structure simplifies, but the changeover time for changing between different preform sizes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholder structureVSAvoidchangeover time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The device replaces fixed holder structures with movable, adjustable holders that can be quickly repositioned between different preform sizes. This dynamic structure allows rapid adaptation to different production requirements without requiring complete disassembly or complex reconfiguration, reducing changeover time while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed with pre-positioned adjustment mechanisms that allow operators to quickly switch between predetermined settings for different preform sizes. These preliminary configurations reduce the time required for changeover by eliminating the need for complex real-time adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves power efficiency by minimizing energy losses during heating, reduces operational costs, and shortens the changeover time between producing different container sizes, ensuring consistent quality and reducing production failures.

Implementation Method 1

The heating modules are arranged externally besides the transport way and supply heat to the preforms via infrared radiation (IR-radiation)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

the infrared radiation is in addition reflected by reflectors arranged besides the transport way and under the transport way or under the bottom of the preforms

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8852492B2Heating device and heating method for blow molding machine as well as blow molding machine
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 KRONES AG
  • US8852492B2 patent drawing
  • US8852492B2 patent drawing
  • US8852492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A heating device and a heating method for a blow molding machine comprise a heating element for radiating heat radiation for heating of preforms. A bottom reflector is movable relative to a counter reflector and is arranged opposite to the heating element for reflection of heat radiation radiated by the heating element in the direction of the preforms. A setting device is used for setting a position (LA+BM, LB+BM) of the bottom reflector relative to the counter reflector.