Movable Induction Coils for Levitation Melting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Levitation melting methods are limited by the small amount of material that can be kept in levitation, making industrial application impractical, and casting into molds is difficult due to the risk of contamination and horizontal expansion of the melt, which restricts the efficiency of the coil field.

Innovation Solution

The method involves movably arranging induction coils with ferromagnetic cores to increase the magnetic field efficiency for levitation, allowing for larger batches, and by moving the coils apart during casting, maintaining a safe distance to prevent contamination while ensuring efficient casting into a mold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the distance between opposing ferrite poles with induction coils is reduced to increase magnetic field efficiency, then the efficiency of the induced magnetic field is improved, but the risk of the melt touching the ferrite poles or induction coils increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of induced magnetic fieldVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The induction units are designed with movable ferrite poles that can dynamically adjust their distance. During the melting phase, the poles are positioned close together to maximize magnetic field efficiency and heating performance. During the casting phase, the poles are moved apart to create sufficient clearance and prevent melt contamination. This dynamic repositioning allows the system to optimize for different operational requirements at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If the amount of material in the batch is increased to improve industrial applicability, then the economic viability is improved, but the levitation stability becomes more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebatch sizeVSAvoidlevitation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The batch material is segmented into multiple smaller sub-batches that are levitated and processed simultaneously in separate induction units or zones. This segmentation allows each individual batch to maintain stable levitation while the total processed quantity is increased through parallel operation. The system can handle larger overall volumes without compromising the levitation stability of individual batches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the cycle time is reduced to improve throughput, then the productivity is improved, but the melting and casting process quality may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocess quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The induction units are designed to operate continuously with overlapping cycles. While one unit is completing its casting phase, another unit is already in the melting phase, and a third is preparing for the next batch. This continuous operation eliminates idle time between cycles and maintains constant productivity. The movable poles ensure that each phase completes efficiently without unnecessary delays, maintaining quality while maximizing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the economic use of levitation melting for larger batches with improved throughput and reduced contamination risks, allowing for heavier materials to be processed with shorter cycle times and minimal heat loss.

Implementation Method 1

alternating electromagnetic fields are generated with at least one pair of opposing induction coils with a core of a ferromagnetic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

heated by inductive currents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

the Lorentz force of the coil field must compensate for the weight force of the batch in order to keep it levitating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11197351B2Levitation melting method using movable induction units
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 ALD VACUUM TECH GMBH
  • US11197351B2 patent drawing
  • US11197351B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a levitation melting process and a device for producing castings with movable induction units. In this process, induction units are used in which the opposite ferrite poles with the induction coils are movable and move in opposite directions. In this way, the induction units for melting the batches can be arranged close together in order to increase the efficiency of the induced magnetic field. When casting the molten batch, the induced magnetic field is reduced by increasing the distance between the ferrite poles with the induction coils, thus preventing the melt from touching the ferrite poles or the induction coils.