Movable Object Task Coordination for Parallel Module Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current systems for configuring movable objects, such as unmanned aerial vehicles, are limited in their ability to efficiently manage and execute multiple tasks in parallel, particularly those requiring coordination of multiple functional modules like flight controls, gimbals, and cameras, making high-level task execution cumbersome and impractical.
Innovation Solution
A method and system using a user terminal to configure and transmit multiple tasks for parallel execution on movable objects, utilizing an interface and processors to control the transmission of tasks, enabling coordination among various functional modules for enhanced versatility and efficiency.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If multiple tasks are configured for parallel execution on movable objects, then productivity and versatility are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of configuration increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments tasks into modular functional components (flight control, gimbal, camera, etc.) that can be independently configured and combined. Each task is broken down into discrete sub-tasks that can be assigned to specific functional modules, making complex parallel task configuration manageable through systematic decomposition rather than monolithic programming.
Solution Approach 2:
The configuration system provides universal interfaces and standardized task templates that work across different movable object types and functional modules. A single configuration framework handles diverse task types (flight paths, camera operations, gimbal control) through unified programming constructs, reducing the need for type-specific configuration code and simplifying parallel task setup.
2Ease of operation
If manual control is used for movable objects, then ease of operation is improved for simple tasks, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate for complex parallel tasks
Solution Approach 1:
The system introduces an intermediary configuration layer between manual control and autonomous execution. Users configure high-level task parameters and coordination rules through simplified interfaces, and the system automatically generates the detailed control sequences for parallel task execution. This intermediary layer translates user-friendly specifications into complex coordinated actions across multiple functional modules.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary configuration of task parameters, coordination rules, and execution sequences before actual task execution. All parallel task configurations, timing schedules, and module coordination details are pre-established through configuration interfaces, allowing the movable object to execute complex parallel tasks autonomously without real-time manual intervention, thus maintaining both ease of operation and high productivity.
Data Source
AI summary
A method of operating a movable object using a user terminal includes configuring, through an interface, a plurality of tasks on the user terminal for parallel execution by the movable object, and transmitting the tasks from the user terminal to the movable object for operating the movable object.