Movable Test Body for Precise AGV Protective Device Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing testing methods for protective devices on driverless transport vehicles are inflexible, often requiring reprogramming and are not suitable for mobile use, leading to inaccurate test results due to premature deceleration from the warning field, and risk returning the device to an incorrect original state.

Innovation Solution

A device with a movably arranged test body that can be positioned in the vehicle's travel path without triggering the protective device's sensor in a first position, and only triggers a safety-related action in a second position, allowing for flexible and accurate testing without reprogramming, with features like a base, test body, and a control and evaluation unit for precise movement and data recording.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a stationary test device is used to test protective devices, then testing can be performed, but the device cannot be used mobile and is not suitable for testing in industrial environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility of test deviceVSAvoidcomplexity of test device
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test device is divided into a base unit and a separate test body that can be detached and positioned independently. This segmentation allows the test body to be placed in the protective field while keeping the base unit stationary or mobile, resolving the contradiction between mobility and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The test body is made movable relative to the base through mechanical, electromechanical, pneumatic, or hydraulic arrangements. This dynamic capability allows the test device to adapt to different testing scenarios and locations, providing mobility without requiring the entire device to be complex and portable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the test body is positioned in the warning field, then the protective device can detect the object, but the vehicle decelerates before entering the protective field resulting in falsified test results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of protective device testingVSAvoidoperation of protective device
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The test body is designed with specific dimensional characteristics (height, width) that are tailored to trigger only the protective field while remaining below the detection threshold of the warning field. This local quality adjustment allows precise control over which field is activated, ensuring accurate testing without premature vehicle deceleration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the protective device is reprogrammed for testing purposes, then objects in the warning field can be ignored, but the device is only tested in a reprogrammed state and may not be returned to its original state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of protective device testingVSAvoidease of returning device to original state
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The test body is pre-configured with specific dimensional parameters that inherently trigger only the protective field under normal operating conditions. This preliminary design eliminates the need for reprogramming the protective device, allowing testing to be performed in the device's original state and ensuring it returns to its normal operation after testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If the test device is dimensioned to be detected by the sensor, then a safety-related action can be triggered, but the device cannot be positioned in the travel path without triggering premature detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of protective field triggeringVSAvoidflexibility in positioning test device
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The solution moves the triggering condition from a two-dimensional plane detection (where the entire device would be detected) to a three-dimensional configuration where only a small portion of the device (the test body at a specific height) intersects with the protective field. This dimensional approach allows the device to be positioned flexibly in the travel path while achieving precise triggering of the protective field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4600628A1Device and method for testing a protective device for securing a route of a vehicle, in particular a driverless transport vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 SICK AG
  • EP4600628A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4600628A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4600628A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

The invention relates to a device for testing a protective device of a vehicle, in particular an automated guided vehicle, wherein the protective device has at least one sensor for monitoring a travel path of the vehicle. The device comprises a base and a test body which is movably arranged on the base and can be moved from a first position to a second position. The device can be positioned in the travel path of the vehicle and is dimensioned such that the device in the travel path of the vehicle cannot be detected by the sensor or, upon detection of the test body, no safety-related action is triggered by the protective device if the test body is in the first position and the test body can be detected by the sensor. Upon detection of the test body, a safety-related action is triggered by the protective device if the test body is in the second position.