Movable Vortex Generators for Aircraft Lift and Drag Trade-off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft devices for increasing aerodynamic lift often cause additional aerodynamic resistance during cruising and are not suitable for environments prone to icing, as they fail to effectively manage flow separation at higher angles of attack or in icy conditions.

Innovation Solution

A lift arrangement featuring movably attached add-on bodies upstream of an aerodynamic lift body, which can be deployed to generate vortices and increase lift, while being retractable to minimize resistance and equipped with heating for operation in icy conditions, thus compensating for lift loss due to ice buildup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If add-on bodies are permanently projected into the airflow to increase lift, then aerodynamic lift is improved, but aerodynamic resistance increases during cruising

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic liftVSAvoidaerodynamic resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The add-on bodies are designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing them to be deployed only when lift enhancement is needed (such as during takeoff, landing, or icing conditions) and retracted during cruising flight to minimize drag. This dynamic configuration enables the system to adapt its aerodynamic profile to current flight requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The lift enhancement system is divided into separable add-on bodies that can be independently deployed and retracted. These modular components are positioned upstream of the main lift body and can be moved between an extended position for vortex generation and a retracted position flush with the fuselage, allowing selective activation based on flight conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If add-on bodies are used to increase lift, then aerodynamic lift is improved, but the device is not suitable for environments prone to icing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic liftVSAvoidoperation in icing environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates heating elements that change the thermal parameter of the add-on bodies, raising their surface temperature above the freezing point to prevent ice accumulation. This thermal parameter change ensures the add-on bodies remain functional and maintain their aerodynamic shape in icing environments, allowing continuous operation without performance degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The heating system provides preliminary protection against icing by maintaining the add-on bodies above freezing temperature before ice can form. This preventive measure counteracts the harmful effect of icing before it can interfere with the aerodynamic function of the add-on bodies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Force

If add-on bodies extend outwardly to generate vortices, then lift increase is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift increaseVSAvoidmovable add-on bodies mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The add-on bodies are integrated with the fuselage structure, sharing common mounting points and structural support. The movable mechanism is combined with the existing aircraft systems where possible, reducing the need for entirely separate complex subsystems and simplifying the overall device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces aerodynamic resistance during cruising and effectively increases lift in icing environments by generating vortices that enhance airflow energy, improving aircraft maneuverability and controllability, especially during landing approaches.

Implementation Method 1

the add-on bodies are adapted in an activation position with airflow to generate vortices that impinge on the lift body, thus leading to an increase in lift on the lift body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex generation: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

equipped with heating for operation in icy conditions, thus compensating for lift loss due to ice buildup

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9193444B2Device and method for increasing the aerodynamic lift of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2015.11.24 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US9193444B2 patent drawing
  • US9193444B2 patent drawing
  • US9193444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lift arrangement for an aircraft includes an aircraft fuselage section with an outside, an aerodynamic lift body attached to the aircraft fuselage section and extending from the aircraft fuselage section outwardly, and a pair of movably held add-on bodies arranged upstream of a leading edge of the aerodynamic lift body. The add-on bodies include an aerodynamically effective surface and are equipped with incoming airflow to generate vortices that impinge on the aerodynamic lift body, thus leading to an increase in lift on the aerodynamic lift body. Thus the lift generation on a lift body is effectively influenced, in particular to compensate for loss of lift as a result of icing. The add-on bodies are moveable, and, can be moved to a neutral position in which they do not project into the flow around the aircraft, and are thus not effective from the point of view of fluid dynamics.