Movement Controller Parameter Checking for Multiaxial Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for checking the parameter set of a movement controller are largely manual and require expert knowledge, lacking an automated and comprehensive approach to ensure parameter consistency and safety, particularly in multiaxial contour operations.

Innovation Solution

A checking method and device that evaluates parameters against defined physical characteristics, allowing for automatic and reliable compliance checks, where physical characteristics can be determined based on other parameters within the parameter set, enabling comprehensive testing and optimization of drive and control parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual checking methods are used for parameter set verification, then expert knowledge can ensure parameter consistency and safety, but the process is time-consuming and requires specialized expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter consistency and safetyVSAvoidchecking time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The checking device automatically verifies parameter sets by itself without requiring external expert intervention. The device retrieves parameter lists from the movement controller, determines physical characteristics from these parameters, and performs compliance checks autonomously, making the system self-sufficient in parameter verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual expert checking is replaced by an automated electronic checking device that uses computer algorithms to perform parameter verification. The mechanical/manual process of expert analysis is substituted with automated information processing and logical comparison operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive parameter checking is performed manually, then parameter consistency can be ensured, but it requires profound expert knowledge and complex analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter consistencyVSAvoidchecking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The checking process is divided into distinct automated steps: retrieving parameter lists from the movement controller, determining physical characteristics from these parameters, and performing compliance checks. This segmentation transforms a complex monolithic expert task into manageable automated sub-tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The checking device acts as an intermediary between the movement controller and the parameter verification process. It automatically retrieves parameter lists from the controller and uses these to determine physical characteristics, serving as a bridge that eliminates the need for direct expert intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated parameter checking is implemented, then the checking process becomes faster and less dependent on experts, but comprehensive checks require sophisticated systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechecking speedVSAvoidchecking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The checking device is designed to handle multiple functions: retrieving parameter lists, determining physical characteristics, performing compliance checks, and identifying inconsistencies. This multi-functionality allows a single automated system to replace multiple specialized manual checking processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The checking device automatically retrieves parameter lists from the movement controller and uses these parameters to determine physical characteristics for compliance checking. This feedback loop where output from one step becomes input for the next enables comprehensive automated verification without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11262721B2Automatic optimization of the parameterization of a movement controller
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 SIEMENS AG
  • US11262721B2 patent drawing
  • US11262721B2 patent drawing
  • US11262721B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A movement controller of a machine uses in the context of processing a part program defining a useful processing action a parameter set having a plurality of parameters to determine, based on commands of the part program and actual values of a number of axes of the machine controlled by the movement controller, control commands for drives of the machine which are associated with the axes and to apply the determined control commands to the drives. A checking device checks the respective parameters for compliance with conditions defined by respective physical characteristics. In many cases, the checking device can determine the respective physical characteristics using other parameters of the parameter set.