Moving robot

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing moving robots require a large number of impact sensors to sense impacts in multiple directions, which increases the size and cost of the robot, and fails to effectively restrain bumper movement upon impact.

Innovation Solution

The robot employs impact sensors placed at an angle with bent pressure parts to sense impacts in multiple directions, and includes a movement guide part with kite-shaped guide holes to restrain bumper movement, allowing for effective impact sensing and position recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If impact sensors are increased in number to sense impact in multiple directions, then impact sensing capability is improved, but moving robot structure size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact sensing capabilityVSAvoidstructure size and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each impact sensor is designed to perform multiple functions by sensing impacts from different directions through strategic angular placement. The pressure parts are configured to transmit forces from multiple directions to the same sensor, allowing one sensor to detect impacts from various directions rather than requiring separate sensors for each direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The impact sensors are placed at angles rather than aligned with cardinal directions, adding a dimensional aspect to impact detection. This angular placement allows sensors to detect impacts from multiple directions simultaneously by resolving force vectors, effectively using spatial arrangement to achieve multi-directional sensing with fewer sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If bumper is made more robust to withstand impact, then impact resistance is improved, but movement restraint capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidmovement restraint
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The bumper system is divided into functional segments: the bumper itself for absorbing impact forces, and separate movement guide parts with protruding guides and guide holes for restraining movement. This segmentation allows the bumper to be optimized for strength while the guide structure handles movement restraint, preventing the need to compromise one function for the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The movement guide part acts as an intermediary between the bumper and the robot body. The protruding guides and guide holes create a mechanical constraint system that restrains bumper movement without requiring the bumper itself to be less robust. This intermediary structure mediates between impact absorption and movement control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11109731B2Moving robot
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11109731B2 patent drawing
  • US11109731B2 patent drawing
  • US11109731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A moving robot is provided. The moving robot includes: a main body forming the exterior appearance; a moving means for moving the main body; a bumper configured to protrude on the outer perimeter of the main body; impact sensors placed at an angle on the main body to sense the movement of the bumper; and pressure parts formed in a bent shape at the end of the impact sensors.