Mower Conditioner Feedback Control for Consistent Crop Conditioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural conditioning systems require manual and time-consuming adjustments of roll gap settings, which fail to account for changing field conditions and crop characteristics, leading to inconsistent conditioning levels.

Innovation Solution

A control system that utilizes sensors to monitor displacement of conditioning components, compares it with target displacements, and adjusts operational speeds of components like rollers and feed rates to maintain consistent conditioning levels automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of roll gap settings is used, then the conditioning system can be operated, but the operator workload increases and conditioning consistency deteriorates under changing field conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator workloadVSAvoidconditioning consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors the actual roll gap displacement using sensors and compares it with the target displacement. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts the operational speed of conditioning components to maintain the desired roll gap setting, eliminating the need for manual adjustments and ensuring consistent conditioning levels under varying field conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The conditioning system performs self-adjustment by automatically modifying its operational speed in response to detected roll gap deviations. The system serves itself by detecting displacement errors and correcting them through speed modulation, freeing the operator from continuous manual intervention while maintaining precise conditioning consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed roll gap settings are used, then the conditioning system structure remains simple, but the system cannot adapt to changing crop loads and conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static, fixed roll gap setting to a dynamic configuration where the operational speed of conditioning components is continuously adjusted. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to respond to changing crop loads and field conditions while maintaining the desired conditioning level, with the control complexity managed through automated feedback loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If manual adjustments are made for different crops, then each crop can be optimized, but the time required for setup increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop-specific optimizationVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The target roll gap displacement for different crop types is pre-configured in the control system. When operating with a specific crop, the operator simply selects the corresponding preset target displacement, and the system automatically adjusts operational speeds to achieve the optimal conditioning for that crop type, eliminating time-consuming manual adjustments while maintaining crop-specific optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250204325A1Crop Conditioning
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 AGCO CORP
  • US20250204325A1 patent drawing
  • US20250204325A1 patent drawing
  • US20250204325A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for monitoring and controlling operation a conditioning system of or otherwise associated with an agricultural machine, which may include a mower conditioner. Sensor data indicative of a displacement associated with component(s) of the conditioning system is used to determine a measured displacement, which is compared with a target displacement for the component(s) and such a comparison is used to control an operational speed of one or more components associated with the conditioning system. The controllable component(s) can include the conditioning component(s), and the one or more controllers may be used to control the operational speed of the conditioning components and ultimately a level of conditioning applied to cut crop material passing through the conditioning system.