Reciprocating Mowing Sickle with Frequency-Tuned Spring Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mowing sickle drive systems are inefficient due to large space requirements and non-optimum speed adjustments, leading to increased wear and energy consumption, especially at low speeds, and they struggle with compensating for rapid changes in inertia.

Innovation Solution

A mowing sickle drive system with a knife bar driven by a linear motor and equipped with a spring having a variable modulus of elasticity, controlled by a flow control valve, to adjust restoring forces based on drive frequency, reducing wear and energy consumption by minimizing restoring force at low speeds and maximizing stiffness at high speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mechanical sickle drive systems with flywheels are used to compensate for rapid changes in inertia, then inertia compensation is achieved, but the device occupies large space and extends laterally outside the cutterbar width

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinertia compensationVSAvoidspace occupied by drive system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the inertia compensation function from the mechanical drive system and relocates it to a separate spring mechanism. The spring is connected to the knife bar to provide restoring force, while the drive system itself is simplified to only perform driving function, thereby reducing the space occupied by the drive system while maintaining inertia compensation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring acts as an intermediary element between the knife bar and the frame, providing inertia compensation through its elastic restoring force. This intermediary mechanism compensates for rapid inertia changes without requiring the knife bar or drive system to occupy additional space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the cutterbar is driven at constant speed proportional to other crop processing systems, then synchronization with threshing and separating systems is maintained, but the cutterbar operates at non-optimum speed for encountered crop conditions and ground speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidspeed adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the drive frequency variable rather than fixed. The linear motor can operate at different frequencies to adjust the cutterbar speed dynamically, allowing optimization for different crop conditions and ground speeds while maintaining synchronization capability through controlled frequency adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If coil springs are used to compensate for rapid changes in inertia in linear electric motor systems, then inertia compensation is achieved, but unnecessary opposing forces are encountered by the motor at low speeds where inertia is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinertia compensationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spring constant is made variable rather than fixed, allowing the spring to provide appropriate restoring force at different operating speeds. At low speeds where inertia is low, the spring constant is reduced to minimize opposing forces and energy consumption, while at high speeds the spring constant increases to provide adequate inertia compensation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of spring constant from a fixed value to a variable value that can be adjusted based on operating conditions. This parameter change allows the spring to adapt its stiffness to match the inertia requirements at different speeds, reducing unnecessary energy consumption at low speeds while maintaining effective inertia compensation at high speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system allows for a compact and efficient operation of the mowing sickle, reducing wear and energy consumption by dynamically adjusting the spring's stiffness in response to changing inertia, enabling optimal speed adjustments and minimizing damage to crops.

Implementation Method 1

a spring connected to the knife bar for applying a restoring force to the knife bar toward a neutral position when in motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the knife bar carries inertia when driven in a reciprocating motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 3

a linear electric motor configured for driving the knife bar in a reciprocating linear motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Data Source

PatentEP3595429B1Inertia compensation for a reciprocating mowing sickle
Publication Date: 2023.08.16 AGCO INT GMBH
  • EP3595429B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3595429B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3595429B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A mowing sickle drive system comprises a knife bar (56) supported by a frame (66) and drive apparatus (64) operable to drive the knife bar (56) in a reciprocating linear motion at a variable drive frequency. A spring (72) is coupled to the knife bar (56) for applying a restoring force to the knife bar (56) toward a neutral position when in motion. The spring (72) has a variable modulus of elasticity that is controlled in dependence upon the drive frequency.