MPC Controller for Air Pollution Control Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional air pollution control systems, such as wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR), face challenges in optimizing SO2 and NOx removal efficiency while maintaining gypsum quality and minimizing operational costs, due to complex interactions and dynamic changes in process and business factors.

Innovation Solution

A model-based multivariable predictive control (MPC) system is implemented to optimize the operation of air pollution control systems by predicting the effects of process parameter changes on emissions and byproduct quality, allowing for real-time adjustment of process variables to meet regulatory and business objectives, such as maximizing SO2 removal and generating regulatory credits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional air pollution control systems operate to maximize pollutant removal, then emission control effectiveness improves, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollutant emissionVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts process parameters based on real-time conditions and predictive models. The MPC controller continuously optimizes operational parameters (such as reagent flow rates, temperatures, and pressures) to achieve the lowest cost operation while maintaining emission compliance, rather than operating at fixed conservative settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically based on predicted future conditions. By using process models to forecast emissions and quality outcomes, the controller adjusts parameters proactively to maintain optimal performance and minimize costs while ensuring regulatory compliance under varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If process parameters are adjusted to optimize emissions, then environmental compliance improves, but byproduct quality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission levelVSAvoidbyproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses predictive models to forecast the impact of parameter changes on both emissions and byproduct quality. The MPC controller adjusts parameters within an optimized range that simultaneously achieves emission compliance and maintains byproduct quality specifications, rather than treating these as conflicting objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback from process measurements and model predictions to continuously monitor and adjust operations. By comparing actual emissions and byproduct quality against targets, the controller makes real-time parameter adjustments to maintain both environmental compliance and product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the system operates closer to regulatory permit levels to maximize credits, then regulatory credit generation improves, but process stability may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory creditVSAvoidprocess stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future emissions and quality outcomes before they occur. The MPC controller anticipates process upsets and adjusts parameters in advance to maintain stability while operating near permit limits, rather than reacting to deviations after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically balances credit maximization with stability maintenance by continuously adapting to changing conditions. When disturbances are detected or predicted, the controller automatically adjusts operating points to maintain process stability while minimizing impact on credit generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7702519B2Estimating an economic parameter related to a process for controlling emission of a pollutant into the air
Publication Date: 2010.04.20 GE VERNOVA INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US7702519B2 patent drawing
  • US7702519B2 patent drawing
  • US7702519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An economic parameter estimator is provided for a process that has multiple process parameters (MPPs) and is performed to control emission of a pollutant into the air. The performance of the process is associated with one or more economic factors (EFs). The estimator includes either a neural network process model or a non-neural network process model. In either case, the model represents a relationship between one or more of the MPPs and an economic parameter. Also included is a processor configured with logic, e.g. programmed software, to estimate a monetary value of the economic parameter based on a value of each of the one or more MPPs, a value of each of at least one of the one or more EFs, and the one model.