Model Predictive Control for Biofuel Dehydration Energy Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Balancing energy usage and water removal in biofuel production processes is complex due to interdependencies between sub-processes like distillation towers and molecular sieves, requiring efficient control to meet commercial moisture specifications with minimal energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

Implementing model predictive control techniques to determine and control energy usage rates and water removal rates in distillation towers and molecular sieves, setting target values for operating parameters to optimize energy efficiency and dehydration processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple sub-processes (distillation towers and molecular sieves) are used to remove water from biofuel, then water removal rate increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater removal rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters of distillation towers and molecular sieves based on real-time process conditions. The control system continuously optimizes the balance between water removal rate and energy consumption by adapting feed rates, temperatures, and pressure conditions to current process needs, rather than operating at fixed settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes physical and chemical parameters such as temperature, pressure, and flow rates in the distillation and molecular sieve processes. By optimizing these parameters dynamically, the system achieves efficient water removal while minimizing energy consumption, resolving the contradiction between productivity and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the most efficient sub-processes are maximized for water removal, then dehydration performance improves, but system complexity increases due to interdependencies between sub-processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the control of distillation towers and molecular sieves into a unified control system that manages both sub-processes simultaneously. This integrated approach coordinates the interdependent operations, allowing the system to maximize dehydration performance while managing the complexity through centralized optimization rather than separate independent controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs multiple functions: it monitors process conditions, optimizes operating parameters, balances energy distribution across sub-processes, and ensures product specifications are met. This multi-functional approach manages system complexity by providing comprehensive control through a single coordinated system rather than multiple specialized controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If energy usage is minimized in dehydration processes, then energy efficiency improves, but water removal rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidwater removal rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes physical parameters such as temperature, pressure, and flow rates in both distillation and molecular sieve processes. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system achieves the minimum energy requirement needed for effective water removal, balancing energy efficiency with adequate dehydration performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system ensures continuous optimization of the dehydration process, maintaining steady operation at optimal energy efficiency points. By keeping the process continuously tuned for energy efficiency rather than allowing intermittent high-energy operation, the system minimizes energy loss while maintaining necessary water removal rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables real-time, optimal control of biofuel production processes, balancing energy usage and water removal, thereby improving efficiency and meeting specifications with reduced energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

molecular sieves with model predictive control technology

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

distillation towers and molecular sieves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentUS9014858B2Energy optimizer for dehydrating biofuels through distillation towers and molecular sieves
Publication Date: 2015.04.21 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US9014858B2 patent drawing
  • US9014858B2 patent drawing
  • US9014858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides novel techniques for controlling the balance between energy usage and biofuels dehydration between a distillation process unit and molecular sieves with model predictive control technology. In particular, the present techniques are presented in the context of biofuel production, wherein control of the balance between energy usage and water removal in biofuel production may be optimized. However, the present techniques may also be applied to any other suitable applications, such as liquor processing, where energy may be used to remove water from the liquor.