MPC Cost Function Penalty for Actuator Tracking Error

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional motor vehicle control systems lack accuracy and responsiveness in controlling actuator systems, leading to inadequate real-time feedback and coordination among various devices, which affects the system's output parameters.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a model predictive control (MPC) module with an MPC solver to determine optimal actuator positions by receiving system parameters, generating control commands, and applying a cost function to reduce steady-state tracking errors, using a penalty term to adjust actuator positions based on a linearized physics-based model and environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional control systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the control accuracy and responsiveness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the control approach by changing from traditional feedback control parameters to model predictive control parameters, incorporating a physics-based model with parameters A, B, and C that represent system dynamics, control input effects, and state-output mappings respectively. This parameter transformation enables higher control accuracy while managing complexity through structured modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control system approaches with a computational model-based control system. By substituting physical trial-and-error tuning with a mathematical model that predicts system behavior, the system achieves superior control accuracy and responsiveness without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If traditional feedback loops are used, then the system structure is simple, but the response speed is too slow to provide real-time feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by using the physics-based model to predict future system states and optimal control inputs before actual disturbances occur. The model proactively calculates control commands based on anticipated system behavior, enabling faster response without waiting for feedback loops to detect and react to deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computational model as an intermediary between the physical system and control commands. This model acts as a virtual representation that processes control logic rapidly, mediating between sensor inputs and actuator commands to achieve real-time response speeds without directly increasing physical system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If traditional control systems are used, then the device complexity is low, but the coordination among various actuators is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination among actuatorsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple actuator control functions into a unified model predictive control framework. By combining the control logic for various actuators into a single optimization problem solved by the MPC solver, the system achieves coordinated control of multiple actuators simultaneously, improving reliability through unified decision-making while managing complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11192561B2Method for increasing control performance of model predictive control cost functions
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11192561B2 patent drawing
  • US11192561B2 patent drawing
  • US11192561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling an actuator system of a motor vehicle includes utilizing a model predictive control (MPC) module with an MPC solver to determine optimal positions of one or more actuators of the actuator system. The method further includes receiving a plurality of actuator system parameters, and triggering the MPC solver to generate one or more control commands from plurality of actuator system parameters. The method further includes applying a cost function to reduce a steady-state tracking error in the one or more control commands from the MPC solver and applying the one or more control commands to alter positions of the one or more actuators, and applying a penalty term to the steady-state predictions of positions of the plurality of actuators to limit a difference between a steady-state prediction of the actuator system and a solution from the MPC solver.