MPC Corrective Response Modeling for Uncertain Scheduled Disturbances

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optimization algorithms for processing plants, particularly those with discontinuous processes, fail to account for uncertain scheduled disturbances, leading to prediction errors and violations of constraints due to assumptions about constant future operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and apparatus that utilize a corrective response model incorporating a constraint failsafe parameter to generate optimization adjustment data, accounting for potential delays in scheduled events by adjusting the input vector and setting a constraint failsafe parameter based on predicted worst-case scenarios, ensuring compliance with inventory level limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If optimization algorithms assume constant future operating conditions, then computational simplicity is maintained, but prediction accuracy deteriorates due to uncertain scheduled disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization algorithm complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating adjustment values for scheduled events before they occur. The system identifies scheduled events in advance, computes their potential impact on constraints, and prepares corrective actions that are then applied when the events actually occur, improving prediction accuracy without requiring complex real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by introducing adjustment values that modify the input vector and constraint values based on scheduled events. Instead of assuming constant operating conditions, the system dynamically adjusts parameters like inventory levels and production rates to account for known future disturbances, maintaining computational efficiency while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If adjustment values are incorporated into the corrective response model, then constraint compliance is improved, but computational load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstraint complianceVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations to determine adjustment values for scheduled events before the optimization run. By pre-computing these values and storing them, the system reduces the computational load during the actual optimization process while still achieving improved constraint compliance through the incorporation of these pre-calculated adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the input vector is adjusted to account for scheduled event delays, then optimization accuracy is improved, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidcorrective response model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the input vector parameters to include adjustment values that account for scheduled event timing uncertainties. This approach improves optimization accuracy by incorporating realistic timing variations while maintaining a relatively simple model structure that builds upon the existing corrective response model framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250013959A1Apparatuses, computer-implemented methods, and computer program products for improved optimization incorporating uncertain scheduled disturbance failsafe
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20250013959A1 patent drawing
  • US20250013959A1 patent drawing
  • US20250013959A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide for improved optimization associated with a dynamic control scheme (e.g., an MPC architecture). Some embodiments identify at a first timestamp prior to a planned start time of a scheduled event associated with a processing unit, an adjustment value associated with the scheduled event. The adjustment value may be defined based on a predicted possible worst scenario of starting the scheduled event at a start time that differs from the planned start time. Some embodiments update a corrective response model to include the adjustment value. The corrective response model may comprise a step response matrix, an input vector parameter, and a constraint failsafe parameter. Some embodiments generate, using the corrective response model and based at least in part on operating condition data associated with the scheduled event, an optimization adjustment data, and generate updated optimization data by applying the optimization adjustment data to offset initial optimization data.