Model Predictive Control With VAE for Multi-Agent Interaction Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control methodologies for agents like robots and vehicles fail to optimize interactions with their environment and other agents in a way that minimizes harm or resource consumption, such as ergonomic considerations and power usage, especially when switching between different optimization strategies based on terrain and task requirements.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using model predictive control (MPC) with variational autoencoders to analyze environment and dynamic data, outputting probabilistic action estimates for optimal control trajectories that consider global constraints and optimize interactions, ensuring robust and efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional control methodologies are used for agent operations, then the control system is simple to implement, but the agent cannot optimize interactions to minimize harm or resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharm and resource consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a cost function as an intermediary element that mediates between the agent's actions and the environment. This cost function quantifies harm and resource consumption, allowing the optimization algorithm to minimize these factors without directly complexifying the control execution. The cost function acts as a bridge that translates complex optimization goals into manageable computational form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control systems with a data-driven optimization approach using neural networks and cost functions. Instead of hard-coded control rules, the system uses learned policies from training data and continuous optimization based on cost functions, substituting mechanical control logic with intelligent algorithms that can adaptively minimize harm and resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If model predictive control with variational autoencoders is implemented, then optimal control trajectories are achieved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness and stability of interactionsVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-training variational autoencoders on extensive environment data and interaction patterns before actual operation. The neural networks learn optimal control policies and cost function relationships during offline training, so that during real-time operation, the system can quickly infer optimal trajectories without performing heavy computational optimization from scratch, thus achieving robustness with manageable real-time complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses variational autoencoders to create compressed representations (encodings) of complex environment states and trajectories. Instead of processing full high-dimensional state spaces, the system works with compressed latent representations that capture essential features, reducing computational complexity while maintaining the ability to generate optimal control trajectories through the decoder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the agent adapts to changing environmental conditions, then interaction optimality is maintained, but the system requires continuous data processing and model updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to changing conditionsVSAvoidenergy for data processing and model updates
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by updating the cost function and re-running optimization only at necessary intervals or when significant environmental changes are detected, rather than continuously. The system uses the pre-trained variational autoencoders to handle routine adaptations efficiently, and only performs full model updates or cost function re-optimization when triggered by specific conditions, reducing energy consumption while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20230050217A1System and method for utilizing model predictive control for optimal interactions
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20230050217A1 patent drawing
  • US20230050217A1 patent drawing
  • US20230050217A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for utilizing model predictive control for optimal interactions that include receiving environment e data associated with a surrounding environment of an ego agent and dynamic data associated with an operation of the ego agent. The system and method also include inputting the environment data and the dynamic data to variational autoencoders. The system and method additionally include utilizing the model predictive control through functional approximation with the variational autoencoders and decoders to output probabilistic action estimates. The system and method further include outputting an estimated optimal control trajectory based on analysis of the probabilistic action estimates to control at least one system of the ego agent to operate within the surrounding environment of the ego agent.