Discrete Contact MR Bio-Sensor with Magnetic Label Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing micro-particle assays face challenges with random label binding sites, signal fluctuations due to label location variations, and large sensor size limitations, which hinder accurate single label and single molecule detection.

Innovation Solution

A method using a well-shaped structure with a continuous MR sensor and controlled field gradient to align magnetic labels uniformly, minimizing label-to-sensor distance variations and eliminating noise by edge pinning, enabling precise localization and simultaneous detection of multiple biological entities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If magnetic labels are bound randomly on the sensor surface, then the binding assay can be performed, but signal fluctuations occur due to label location variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding assay capabilityVSAvoidsignal stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a controlled magnetic field gradient before the detection process to pre-align magnetic labels along the sensor edge. This preliminary alignment action ensures that labels are positioned in a controlled manner rather than randomly, thereby reducing signal fluctuations while maintaining the binding assay capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a non-uniform magnetic field distribution with a gradient that concentrates labels at specific locations (along the sensor edge). This local concentration of labels in a controlled region improves measurement precision by eliminating the randomness of label positions across the entire sensor surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If the MR sensor size is reduced for miniaturization, then device complexity and form factor improve, but detection precision and signal strength deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform factorVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional sensor surface to a three-dimensional configuration by positioning the sensor beneath a well structure and utilizing vertical magnetic field gradients. This dimensional change allows the sensor to detect labels at multiple positions (along the well edge) rather than requiring a large planar sensor area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the detection function by using multiple discrete contact pads arranged in an array. Each contact pad can independently detect signals from labels at different positions along the well edge, allowing a compact sensor structure to achieve high spatial resolution through functional segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If discrete contact pads are used instead of continuous sensor, then label alignment precision improves, but sensor variations and noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel alignment precisionVSAvoidsensor signal stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple discrete contact pad signals into a unified detection system. By processing signals from multiple contact pads in an array and identifying peak patterns across the array, the system achieves high alignment precision while compensating for individual sensor variations through ensemble measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves high spatial resolution and accurate detection of single biological entities by minimizing signal fluctuations and sensor variations, allowing for precise counting and identification of magnetic entities with peak pattern recognition.

Implementation Method 1

there is a gradient over the region where the walls and floor of the well meet. This has the effect of drawing the target molecules or cells under detection up against the wall and floor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field gradient: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

detect the magnetic field emanating from the bound magnetic labels with magneto-resistive (MR) sensors. This magnetic field from the magnetic labels can then change the MR sensor's resistance state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagneto-resistive effect: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentUS11313834B2Discrete contact MR bio-sensor with magnetic label field alignment
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 HEADWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11313834B2 patent drawing
  • US11313834B2 patent drawing
  • US11313834B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention describes a family of sensors for assaying macro-molecules and/or biological cells in solution. The invention also describes methods of making and using the sensors. Each sensor has the form of a well (a hollow cylinder having a floor but no lid) or a trench whose walls comprise a plurality of GMR or TMR devices. Suitably shaped magnets located below each well's floor pull labeled particles into the well/trench and up against the inner wall where a field gradient orients them for optimum detection. Any unattached labels that happen to also be in the well/trench are removed through suitably sized holes in the floor.