Automated MR Image Quality Inspection and Parameter Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual quality inspection of MR images in magnetic resonance scanners is prone to errors, leading to repeated examinations, increased patient risk, and costs due to the time-consuming nature of evaluating image quality, which can result in suboptimal image quality and unnecessary re-scans.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for generating MR images that includes performing quality inspections and adjusting parameters or procedures to improve image quality, reducing the need for manual intervention and shortening patient wait times by automatically modifying settings such as signal-to-noise ratios, movement detection, and protocol selection based on predefined thresholds and machine learning algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual quality inspection is performed by trained operators, then image quality assessment can be conducted, but the process is time-consuming and prone to errors leading to repeated examinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidpatient wait time in scanner
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic self-inspection of MR image quality using computerized algorithms that evaluate images against predefined quality criteria, eliminating the need for manual operator assessment and enabling immediate quality determination without patient waiting time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical inspection process with an automated computerized evaluation system that uses algorithms to assess image quality metrics, substituting human operators with an automated digital assessment mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual quality inspection is performed, then image quality can be evaluated, but incorrect results may occur requiring repeated examinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality inspection accuracyVSAvoidexamination throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automatic feedback loops where quality inspection results immediately trigger appropriate actions - either proceeding to the next examination or automatically initiating corrective measures such as parameter adjustments or re-scan protocols, ensuring high reliability without reducing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary automatic quality assessment immediately after image acquisition to identify potential quality issues before they require manual review, enabling early intervention and preventing the need for repeated examinations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If repeated examinations are performed due to low image quality, then patient safety risks increase, but automated quality inspection and correction is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient risk from repeated exposureVSAvoidautomated quality control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements beforehand cushioning by performing preliminary quality checks and automatically applying corrective actions before low-quality images are finalized or repeated scans are initiated, preventing patient exposure to unnecessary repeated radiation or contrast agent administration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated quality control intermediary system that acts as a mediator between image acquisition and clinical decision-making, using computerized algorithms to assess quality and trigger appropriate responses without requiring complex manual intervention protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If automated quality inspection and parameter adjustment is implemented, then image quality improves and re-scans are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMR image qualityVSAvoidautomated control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts acquisition parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio thresholds, movement detection settings, and protocol selection based on real-time quality assessment, dynamically optimizing image quality through parameter modification without requiring complex hardware changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation where the quality inspection system continuously monitors image quality metrics and automatically modifies acquisition parameters or protocols in real-time, creating a flexible responsive system that adapts to varying imaging conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8988074B2Method for generating MR images and correspondingly embodied magnetic resonance scanner
Publication Date: 2015.03.24 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US8988074B2 patent drawing
  • US8988074B2 patent drawing
  • US8988074B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention relates to the generation of MR images of a volume section within an examination object by way of a magnetic resonance scanner. In at least one embodiment, the following steps are performed: generating at least one of the MR images; automatically performing a number of quality inspections on the at least one MR image; and, should one of these quality inspections fail, an action is automatically performed in order to improve a quality when generating more of the MR images.