MR Imaging Fat Signal Suppression via Inversion Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques face challenges in completely suppressing the signal of a second spin species, such as fat, which can lead to incomplete separation and residual signals due to sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities and long preparation times, affecting clinical evaluation and image quality.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an inversion pulse followed by an excitation pulse and manipulation pulses with gradient pulses, where the amplitude and flip angles of the pulses differ for the first and second spin species based on their frequency shift and spin-lattice relaxation times, allowing for selective suppression of the second spin species signal in MRI data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fat suppression techniques (Dixon, SSGR) are used, then fat signal suppression is achieved, but sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities increases and preparation time becomes long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefat signal suppression completenessVSAvoidsensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by utilizing the different spin-lattice relaxation times (T1) of fat and water protons. By selecting a specific inversion time (TI) that corresponds to the zero-crossing point of the fat signal recovery curve, the method achieves complete fat signal suppression. This parameter-based approach (timing the excitation pulse at the optimal TI) is less sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities compared to frequency-based methods like Dixon or SSGR, as it relies on the inherent temporal relaxation characteristics rather than frequency shifts that vary with field inhomogeneity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional fat suppression techniques are used, then fat signal suppression is achieved, but measurement duration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefat signal suppression completenessVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by optimizing the inversion time (TI) to match the zero-crossing point of the fat signal recovery, which typically occurs around 200-300ms for conventional fat suppression. By using this optimized TI parameter, the method achieves complete fat suppression in a single inversion-recovery cycle, eliminating the need for multiple sequential pulses or complex multi-step sequences required by alternative methods, thus reducing overall preparation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If inversion pulse with different flip angles for first and second spin species is applied, then complete suppression of second spin species is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal suppression completenessVSAvoidpulse sequence complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by utilizing the different T1 relaxation times of the two spin species to achieve selective suppression through timing alone. The inversion pulse is applied with a flip angle optimized for the first spin species (e.g., 90°), and the excitation pulse is timed to occur at the zero-crossing point of the second spin species' recovery curve. This approach achieves complete suppression of the second species without requiring complex pulse sequences with varying flip angles for different species, as the temporal separation at the zero-crossing point provides the selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively suppresses the signal of the second spin species, improving image quality by reducing artifacts and enhancing clinical evaluation capabilities while minimizing sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities and shortening measurement duration.

Implementation Method 1

The first spin species and the second spin species have different spin-lattice relaxation times

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin-lattice relaxation:

Implementation Method 2

Within the scope of magnetic resonance (MR) data acquisition of signals elicited from nuclear spins, a longitudinal magnetization is polarized in a basic magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance:

Implementation Method 3

The resonance frequency of nuclear spins depends on the molecular or chemical environment. This effect is designated as a chemical shift or frequency shift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency shift:

Implementation Method 4

A spatial resolution of the MR data can be generated by application of gradient pulses that produce spatially variable gradient fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic gradient:

Implementation Method 5

This can be specifically manipulated, for example dephased and rephased so that an echo is produced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEcho formation: Echo

Data Source

PatentUS10768253B2MR imaging with signal suppression of a spin series
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US10768253B2 patent drawing
  • US10768253B2 patent drawing
  • US10768253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a magnetic resonance measurement sequence, an inversion pulse is applied that acts on a longitudinal magnetization of a first spin species and a second spin species, for example on a water portion and a fat portion. An excitation pulse is applied after a predetermined time period. At least one manipulation pulse is subsequently applied, respectively with associated gradient pulse.