MR Phase Correction via Power Series Approximation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for phase correction in magnetic resonance (MR) data acquisition, particularly in segmented imaging techniques like TSE and EPI, often fail to adequately correct for phase differences between segments, leading to artifacts, especially in regions of low signal intensity and around the examination subject of interest.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine phase correction parameters by analyzing correlations between phase correction data sets, allowing for robust and precise correction of phase differences between segments, using power series approximations and spatial weighting to enhance the accuracy of phase correction, particularly in regions of interest.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional phase correction methods are used in segmented MR data acquisition, then the acquisition process can be completed, but phase differences between segments lead to artifacts and reduced image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidphase artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by acquiring phase correction data sets before the actual imaging data acquisition. These phase correction data sets are used to determine phase correction parameters that are then applied to correct the imaging data segments, preventing phase artifacts from occurring in the final image rather than attempting to fix them afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the acquired phase correction data sets to calculate phase correction parameters, which are then applied back to the imaging data segments. This closed-loop approach continuously refines the phase correction based on the actual phase differences observed in the correction data, thereby reducing artifacts and improving image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If phase correction parameters are determined using conventional methods, then processing can be completed, but correction accuracy is insufficient particularly in low signal intensity regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase correction accuracyVSAvoidcorrection robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by determining phase correction parameters based on phase correction data sets acquired with specific pulse sequences and parameters. The method adjusts and optimizes correction parameters such as phase offsets and phase evolution rates based on the characteristics of the phase correction data, thereby improving correction accuracy particularly in low signal intensity regions where conventional methods fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8497681B2Magnetic resonance method and apparatus to determine phase correction parameters
Publication Date: 2013.07.30 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US8497681B2 patent drawing
  • US8497681B2 patent drawing
  • US8497681B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a magnetic resonance system and operating method to determine phase correction parameters for a phase correction in MR image data, first and second phase correction data sets are thereby acquired and correlations are calculated between data of the second phase correction data set and data of the first phase correction data set. Phase correction parameters are determined, such as coefficients of a power series that approximates a curve of a phase difference between phase curves of the second and first phase correction data sets.