MR System Protocol Optimization via Dispersed Data Mining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Purchasers of magnetic resonance systems often lack experience in handling and optimizing these systems, leading to inefficient use of the 3000+ available protocols, resulting in wasted development and validation costs, as well as difficulties in finding the right protocol adjustments, despite customer training and application specialist support.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that evaluates data from geographically dispersed MR system customer sites to identify best-in-class customers' parameters, hardware, and software components, formulating optimized customer-specific protocols by analyzing data using data mining and statistical analysis tools like RapidMiner, and providing customer-specific reports and offers to improve performance and workflows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If customer training and application specialist support are provided, then customers can access protocols and adjust parameters, but the cost and time required to find optimal settings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of finding optimal protocol settingsVSAvoidtime to find right protocol adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects usage data from multiple customer sites, analyzes performance metrics, and provides feedback in the form of optimized protocol recommendations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables customers to improve their operational efficiency continuously without requiring extensive training or specialist support at each step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies best-performing protocols from top customers and automatically copies these proven configurations to other customers with similar system characteristics. This eliminates the need for each customer to independently discover optimal settings through trial and error or expert guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If 3000+ protocols are made available to customers, then system versatility increases, but development, testing and validation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of available protocolsVSAvoiddevelopment and validation costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of developing and validating numerous distinct protocols, the system maintains a core set of protocols and optimizes them by changing parameters based on performance data from different customer sites. This parameter-based adaptation approach preserves versatility while significantly reducing development and validation efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates universal protocol templates that can be automatically adapted to different customer needs through parameter adjustment rather than requiring separate customized protocols for each application. This multi-functional approach allows a single protocol framework to serve multiple purposes across diverse customer sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If customers customize protocol names and parameters, then customer-specific optimization is achieved, but protocol management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer-specific protocol optimizationVSAvoidprotocol management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the essential optimization logic from complex customer-specific customizations and separates it into reusable pattern templates. This extraction process simplifies protocol management by allowing customers to leverage pre-analyzed optimization patterns rather than managing individual customizations manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10515316B2System and method for using data obtained from a group of geographically dispersed magnetic resonance systems to optimize customer-specific clinical, operational and/or financial performance
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US10515316B2 patent drawing
  • US10515316B2 patent drawing
  • US10515316B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for optimizing customer magnetic resonance systems is provided. An automation system gathers data from a geographically dispersed network of installed magnetic resonance systems, which data is mined and analyzed in order to recognize patterns about the best practices of the installed base. Customer-specific variables for customer magnetic resonance systems are then optimized, based on the recognized patterns. More particularly, customer specific protocols and hardware/software configurations can be calculated and optimized, by making use of data mined from best-in-class customers having similar profiles.