MR Pulse Sequence Adjustment Using Patient Motion Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Patient movement during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can significantly degrade image quality, necessitating re-recording of MR signals and limiting diagnostic effectiveness, as existing methods either correct for movement post-image acquisition or rely on external sensors and navigators that are not proactive in preventing movement artifacts.

Innovation Solution

A method that records patient movement signals before and during MR examinations to predict future movement, allowing for dynamic adjustment of the pulse sequence to minimize movement artifacts by selecting optimal imaging sequences such as SPACE, TSE, PROPELLER, or HASTE based on movement probability information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If patient movement correction methods are used (navigators, external sensors, cameras), then movement artifacts can be reduced, but device complexity and measurement time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the patient's own physiological signals (breathing, heartbeat) detected by MR-compatible sensors to automatically adjust pulse sequence parameters, eliminating the need for external correction systems like cameras or complex navigators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The pulse sequence parameters (such as timing, repetition rate) are dynamically adjusted based on real-time analysis of patient movement signals, allowing the system to adapt to patient state without adding complex hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple averagings are performed to reduce movement influence, then image quality improves, but measurement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the number of averagings needed based on real-time patient movement assessment, performing only as many repetitions as necessary to achieve acceptable image quality rather than always using fixed high numbers of averagings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Movement signals are continuously monitored and fed back to adjust the acquisition protocol in real-time, allowing the system to reduce or skip averagings when patient movement is minimal and maintain quality when movement occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If inherently robust sequences (radial, PROPELLER) are used, then resistance to movement improves, but productivity and image quality for certain applications decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement robustnessVSAvoidimaging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between different pulse sequence types (conventional vs. robust sequences like PROPELLER) based on real-time patient movement assessment, using efficient sequences when appropriate and robust sequences only when movement requires it

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of always using robust sequences, the system changes pulse sequence parameters adaptively based on patient state, maintaining high productivity when possible and switching to movement-resistant sequences only when necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If recordings are only carried out in certain breathing or ECG states, then movement artifacts are reduced, but measurement time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Patient movement characteristics are assessed in advance during positioning or preliminary scans, allowing the system to pre-determine optimal pulse sequence parameters before the actual diagnostic imaging begins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time monitoring of physiological signals provides feedback to adjust acquisition timing and parameters, allowing flexible synchronization with breathing or cardiac cycles without requiring strict gating that would extend measurement time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3553548B1Magnetic resonance pulse sequence adjustment using motion forecasting
Publication Date: 2022.06.08 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
  • EP3553548B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3553548B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3553548B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for setting the pulse sequence of a magnetic resonance (MR) examination of a patient, an MR device (10), and a computer program. The method comprises the following steps: A motion signal is acquired, which depends on the patient's movement. Based on the motion signal and a determination information, a motion probability information is determined. This motion probability information includes a probability of future patient movement. The pulse sequence is set based on this motion probability information.