Automated MR Scanning Range Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for multi-station magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are time-consuming and prone to errors due to the manual planning required for positioning patients to record partial images, which can lead to spatial distortions and limit the accuracy of subsequent medical diagnostics.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for MR imaging that uses a processor to determine scanning ranges based on an overview image of the patient, ensuring each scanning range includes at least one anatomic region, with lengths adjusted to match the longest range in each direction, allowing for precise positioning and composition of an overall image with minimal distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual planning is used for positioning patients in multi-station MR imaging, then flexibility in customizing scanning ranges is maintained, but planning time increases and errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning timeVSAvoidaccuracy of scanning range determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines scanning ranges by processing overview images and identifying anatomical regions, eliminating the need for manual planning by medical personnel. The automated algorithm independently performs the entire planning process, from image acquisition to scanning range definition, thereby reducing both time consumption and human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of planning and positioning is replaced by an automated computer-based system. The processor automatically analyzes overview images, identifies anatomical structures, and calculates optimal scanning ranges, substituting human expertise with computational algorithms that provide consistent and reproducible results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If scanning ranges are manually determined, then adaptability to individual patient needs is maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of planning process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis of the overview image to identify all anatomical regions and determine optimal scanning ranges before the actual imaging process begins. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex manual planning during the imaging procedure, streamlining the entire workflow and improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts scanning parameters such as scanning ranges, positioning coordinates, and imaging parameters based on the analyzed overview image. This automated parameter adjustment eliminates manual intervention and simplifies the planning process while maintaining adaptability to individual patient anatomical variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If automated scanning range determination is implemented, then planning time is reduced and reproducibility is improved, but image quality may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of imaging protocolVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the processed overview image is continuously analyzed to verify and adjust scanning range determinations. This feedback loop ensures that automated decisions align with anatomical realities, maintaining image quality while achieving consistent reproducibility across different scans and operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts scanning parameters based on real-time analysis of the overview image, allowing flexible adaptation to individual patient anatomical variations. This dynamic approach maintains high image quality by automatically optimizing scanning ranges for each patient while ensuring reproducible protocols through consistent algorithmic application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces planning time, minimizes errors, and enhances the reproducibility of MR images, making multi-station MR imaging more efficient and cost-effective while maintaining high image quality.

Implementation Method 1

magnetic moments (spins) of nuclei are deflected from their rest position (which typically lies parallel to a basic magnetic field of several Tesla) by irradiating radio-frequency (RF) pulses, and the signal emitted during relaxation of the spins is used for imaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9599689B2Magnetic resonance imaging method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2017.03.21 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US9599689B2 patent drawing
  • US9599689B2 patent drawing
  • US9599689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method and apparatus for automatic magnetic resonance imaging of a patient, an MR overall image is composed from several MR partial images. An MR overview image is received by a process that determines several scanning ranges based on the MR overview image. The MR scanning ranges are characterized by a length along a first direction. For all MR scanning ranges: the length along the first direction is set equal to the length of the longest MR scanning range in the first direction.