MRAC Stability Limits for Human-in-the-Loop Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Adaptive control systems, particularly model reference adaptive controllers (MRAC), face challenges in maintaining stability when interfaced with human operators due to human reaction delays, leading to potential instability in applications like pilot-induced oscillations, and lack an analytical framework for rigorous control design in human-in-the-loop scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive control theoretic modeling approach is developed to investigate dynamic interactions between human models and MRAC frameworks, incorporating human reaction delays, to determine stability limits and ensure system stability, using a method that adjusts control commands based on actual and reference actions with time-delays, and validates the MRAC scheme to ensure stable operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive control systems (MRAC) are used to cope with system uncertainties, then the system can effectively handle uncertainties online with less modeling information, but the system may become unstable when interfaced with human operators due to human reaction delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to cope with system uncertaintiesVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a stability validation framework that uses feedback from stability analysis to adjust control parameters. The system continuously monitors whether operating parameters remain within stability limits and adjusts parameters accordingly to maintain stability while preserving adaptive capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes control parameters dynamically based on validated stability limits. By adjusting parameters such as adaptation rates and control gains within predetermined stability boundaries, the system maintains both adaptability to uncertainties and stability during human-in-the-loop operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fixed-gain robust control design approaches are used, then system stability can be maintained, but extensive and costly verification and validation procedures are required to characterize uncertainty bounds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidverification and validation procedures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary stability analysis and validation before deployment to establish predetermined stability limits. This upfront work characterizes safe operating parameter ranges, eliminating the need for extensive verification and validation procedures during actual operation while maintaining robust stability guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial validation by focusing on critical stability limits rather than exhaustive verification of all possible uncertainties. This selective approach provides sufficient stability guarantees without requiring complete characterization of all uncertainty bounds, reducing validation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If human reaction delays are accounted for in the control model, then stability limits can be determined, but the control design becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability limit determinationVSAvoidcontrol design framework
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary stability validation layer between the human operator and the adaptive controller. This intermediary component handles the complexity of delay-compensated stability analysis separately, allowing the main control design to remain simple while still accounting for human reaction delays through predetermined stability limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10618525B2Validating and computing stability limits of human-in-the-loop adaptive control systems
Publication Date: 2020.04.14 BILKENT UNIVERSITY
  • US10618525B2 patent drawing
  • US10618525B2 patent drawing
  • US10618525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for implementing and/or validating a model reference adaptive control (MRAC) for human-in-the-loop control of a vehicle system. A first operator model is applied to a first feedback-loop-based MRAC scheme, wherein the first operator model is configured to adjust a control command provided as an input to the MRAC scheme based at least in part on an actual action of the vehicle system and a reference action for the vehicle system with a time-delay. A stability limit of a first operating parameter is determined for the MRAC scheme based on the application of the first operator model to the first feedback-loop-based MRAC scheme. The MRAC scheme is validated in response to determining that expected operating conditions of the first operating parameter are within the determined stability limit of the first operating parameter.