Magneto-resistive Free Layer with Dual Curie Temperature for Low Power STT-MRAM

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magneto-resistive devices face challenges in achieving low power consumption and high thermal stability, particularly in reducing magnetization switching current and maintaining thermal stability during writing operations, while existing solutions either increase layer thickness or fail to address thermal stability effectively.

Innovation Solution

The proposed magneto-resistive device incorporates a magnetic tunnel junction with a free layer comprising a first magnetic layer and a second magnetic layer, where the second magnetic layer has a Curie temperature lower than the first, allowing for reduced power consumption and improved thermal stability by optimizing the Curie temperature range and magnetic anisotropy constants, and includes a magnetic-coupling control layer to manage magnetic coupling between the layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional free layer material (CoFeB-based) is used to achieve perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, then the magnetization direction can be controlled, but the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy is low and the material selection range is very narrow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperpendicular magnetic anisotropyVSAvoidmaterial selection range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite free layer structure consisting of a first magnetic layer (CoFeB-based) and a second magnetic layer (FePt-based or similar) with different magnetic properties. The first layer provides perpendicular magnetic anisotropy while the second layer has higher Curie temperature and different magnetization characteristics. This composite structure overcomes the limitations of single-material systems by combining the advantages of multiple materials to achieve both sufficient perpendicular anisotropy and broader material selection flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The free layer is segmented into multiple magnetic sub-layers with distinct functional roles. The first magnetic layer (adjacent to the pinned layer) is optimized for perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and spin polarization, while the second magnetic layer is designed with higher thermal stability and different magnetization dynamics. This segmentation allows each sub-layer to be independently optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between achieving high perpendicular anisotropy and maintaining material versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the Curie temperature of the free layer is high to ensure thermal stability, then thermal stability is improved, but the magnetization switching current increases and power consumption rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal stabilityVSAvoidmagnetization switching current
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating spatial variation in Curie temperature across the free layer structure. The first magnetic layer (CoFeB-based) has lower Curie temperature and is positioned where spin transfer torque acts most effectively, enabling low-current switching. The second magnetic layer has higher Curie temperature and provides thermal stability. This local differentiation allows the system to achieve both low switching current and high thermal stability by optimizing each region's properties for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the free layer thickness is increased to improve thermal stability, then thermal stability is enhanced, but the magnetization switching current and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal stabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing the thickness of a single magnetic layer, the patent uses a composite structure where a thin first magnetic layer (optimized for switching) is combined with a second magnetic layer (optimized for thermal stability). This approach achieves enhanced thermal stability through the combined magnetic moment of multiple layers rather than through increased thickness of a single layer, thereby avoiding the penalty of increased switching current and power consumption that would result from thickening a uniform layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Device complexity

If a single magnetic layer is used in the free layer to simplify the structure, then device complexity is reduced, but thermal stability during writing operations is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefree layer structureVSAvoidthermal stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the free layer into multiple magnetic sub-layers, each with optimized properties for its specific function. The first magnetic layer is designed for efficient spin transfer torque switching with appropriate perpendicular anisotropy, while the second magnetic layer provides enhanced thermal stability. This segmentation achieves sufficient thermal stability during writing operations by distributing functions across specialized sub-layers rather than relying on a single thick layer, and the modular structure allows independent optimization of each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces the magnetization switching current and enhances thermal stability, enabling more efficient and stable data storage with reduced power consumption, suitable for next-generation memory devices like STT-MRAM.

Implementation Method 1

the second magnetic layer has a Curie temperature lower than a Curie temperature of the first magnetic layer... The second magnetic layer may have a Curie temperature that is lower than a temperature of the magneto-resistive device during a writing operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurie temperature phase transition: Curie Point (ferromagnetic)

Implementation Method 2

a writing operation may be performed using a spin transfer magnetization inversion technique (e.g., a spin transfer torque (STT) technique)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin transfer torque:

Implementation Method 3

a read operation may be performed using such a magneto-resistive effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagneto-resistive effect: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentUS9715915B2Magneto-resistive devices including a free layer having different magnetic properties during operations
Publication Date: 2017.07.25 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9715915B2 patent drawing
  • US9715915B2 patent drawing
  • US9715915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Magneto-resistive devices with lower power consumption and higher stability are provided. The magneto-resistive devices may include a pinned layer, a free layer and an insulating layer between the pinned layer and the free layer. The pinned layer, the free layer and the insulating layer may constitute a magnetic tunnel junction. The free layer may include a first magnetic layer and a second magnetic layer that has a Curie temperature lower than a Curie temperature of the first magnetic layer.