MRAM Selector Threshold Voltage Segmentation for Latency and Capacity Trade-offs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current memory devices using magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM) face challenges in optimizing both performance and storage capacity due to the limitations of selector threshold voltages, which affect read and write operations and power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The memory device employs two types of memory matrices with selectors having different threshold voltages, allowing for optimized performance in one matrix and increased storage capacity in another, by varying the arsenic concentration in the silicon oxide films of the selectors and adjusting their thicknesses to suit specific memory cell arrays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single type of memory matrix with uniform selector threshold voltage is used, then the device structure is simple and manufacturing is easier, but both performance and storage capacity cannot be simultaneously optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization of performance and storage capacityVSAvoidmemory matrix structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory device is divided into multiple memory matrices (first memory matrix and second memory matrix) with different selector threshold voltages. The first memory matrix uses selectors with first threshold voltages optimized for performance, while the second memory matrix uses selectors with second threshold voltages optimized for storage capacity, allowing each segment to serve its specific function optimally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the memory device are assigned different selector threshold voltage characteristics. The first memory matrix region has selectors with higher threshold voltages for better performance, while the second memory matrix region has selectors with lower threshold voltages for increased capacity, creating local optimization throughout the device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If selector threshold voltage is increased to improve performance, then read and write operations are optimized, but storage capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess performanceVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The memory device is segmented into multiple matrices with different threshold voltage characteristics. The first memory matrix uses selectors with higher threshold voltages to achieve fast access performance, while the second memory matrix uses selectors with lower threshold voltages to enable higher storage capacity, allowing both requirements to be met simultaneously in different segments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If selector threshold voltage is decreased to increase storage capacity, then more memory cells can be stored, but access performance deteriorates and power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidaccess performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory device is divided into multiple matrices where the second memory matrix uses selectors with lower threshold voltages to achieve increased storage capacity, while the first memory matrix uses selectors with higher threshold voltages to maintain fast access performance and lower power consumption for performance-critical operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If uniform selector threshold voltage is used across all memory matrices, then manufacturing process is simplified, but chip performance cannot be maximized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing processVSAvoidchip performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the chip are assigned different selector threshold voltage characteristics to optimize local performance. The first memory matrix region has selectors with higher threshold voltages for fast access, while the second memory matrix region has selectors with lower threshold voltages for high capacity, maximizing overall chip performance through local optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances access performance, reduces power consumption, and maximizes chip performance by balancing latency, storage capacity, and endurance across different memory matrices.

Implementation Method 1

A memory device which adopts a magnetoresistance effect element as a memory element is known

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetoresistance effect: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentUS12020737B2Memory device, memory system, and method of manufacturing memory device
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 KIOXIA CORP
  • US12020737B2 patent drawing
  • US12020737B2 patent drawing
  • US12020737B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory device includes a memory cell array, first and second memory cells, first and second read circuits, and first and second write circuits. The memory cell array includes first and second sub-arrays. The first memory cells are included in each of the first sub-arrays. The second memory cells are included in each of the second sub-arrays. The first and second read circuits are provided for reading data of the first and second memory cells, respectively. The first and second write circuits are provided for writing data to the first and second memory cells, respectively. An area of the first sub-array is different from an area of the second sub-array.