Stress-Inducing Layer for MRAM Coercive Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetoresistive random access memories (MRAMs) face challenges such as coercive force (Hc) errors and retention failure bits due to difficulties in enhancing integration density and high-speed operations.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor device structure incorporating a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) with a capping layer, a stress-inducing layer having tensile stress, and electrodes, where the stress-inducing layer is made of titanium nitride with a thickness of about 4 nm to 10 nm, is used to improve electrical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If integration density is increased in MRAM devices, then device capacity improves, but coercive force errors and retention failure bits increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidcoercive force accuracy and retention reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing a stress-inducing layer with specific tensile stress characteristics to modify the magnetic anisotropy and coercive force of the MTJ structure. This allows optimization of magnetic properties to maintain reliability while scaling integration density. The stress-inducing layer parameters (material composition, thickness, stress magnitude) are tuned to achieve desired coercive force values and retention characteristics in high-density configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining the stress-inducing layer (e.g., silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride) with the MTJ stack and capping layer to create a multi-layer composite structure. This composite approach enables simultaneous optimization of mechanical stress distribution and magnetic properties, resolving the contradiction between high integration density and reliable magnetic switching behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Speed

If high-speed operations are implemented in MRAM devices, then operation speed improves, but device reliability deteriorates due to coercive force errors and retention failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation speedVSAvoidcoercive force accuracy and retention reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The stress-inducing layer modifies the magnetic switching characteristics by altering the effective anisotropy field, enabling faster switching speeds while maintaining adequate coercive force margins. The controlled tensile stress reduces the switching current requirement and narrows the switching distribution, thereby improving both speed and reliability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely magnetic field-based switching with a magneto-mechanical approach where mechanical stress from the stress-inducing layer is used to modulate magnetic properties. This substitution enables more precise control over coercive force and switching behavior, improving reliability during high-speed operations without sacrificing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If a stress-inducing layer with tensile stress is added to the device structure, then coercive force and switching current improve, but device structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoercive force accuracy and switching current controlVSAvoidlayer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stress-inducing layer serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical stress to control magnetic anisotropy, acts as a structural support layer, and can serve as part of the electrode structure or interconnect scheme. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated layers, thereby limiting the increase in overall device complexity while achieving improved magnetic properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the stress-inducing layer with other device components such as the capping layer or electrode structures, combining multiple functions into a single integrated layer. This merging approach minimizes the additional structural complexity by consolidating stress induction with other necessary device functions, thereby reducing the net increase in layer count and fabrication steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The semiconductor device exhibits improved coercive force, reduced retention failure bits, and increased switching current, leading to enhanced performance and lifespan.

Implementation Method 1

The stress-inducing layer may have tensile stress

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress:

Data Source

PatentUS10937952B2Semiconductor devices including stress-inducing layers and methods of forming the same
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10937952B2 patent drawing
  • US10937952B2 patent drawing
  • US10937952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device includes a first electrode disposed on a substrate, a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) on the first electrode, a capping layer on the MTJ, a stress-inducing layer on the capping layer, and a second electrode on the stress-inducing layer. The stress-inducing layer may have tensile stress.