MRF Acquisition Parameter Optimization Using Cramer-Rao Bound

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) faces challenges in achieving accurate and efficient quantitative tissue property mapping due to long acquisition times, limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency, and difficulty in achieving high spatial resolution, particularly for T2 maps and high-field applications.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using a Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) as a configuration metric to optimize MRF acquisition parameters such as flip angle and repetition time, allowing for improved SNR efficiency and reduced acquisition time by determining imaging parameters that balance tradeoffs in experiment design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional MRF techniques use random or pseudo-random variation of acquisition parameters to achieve quantitative mapping, then multiple tissue parameters can be simultaneously acquired at ultrafast speed, but the SNR efficiency remains limited and acquisition time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging speedVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying acquisition parameters (flip angle, repetition time, echo time) in a controlled manner rather than randomly. This allows optimization of the fingerprinting sequence to improve SNR efficiency while maintaining fast imaging capabilities, resolving the contradiction between speed and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If long sequences of images with different contrast-weightings are acquired to obtain accurate quantitative tissue properties, then measurement accuracy is improved, but acquisition time becomes prohibitively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantitative tissue property accuracyVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by pre-calculating optimal acquisition parameter sequences that maximize information content for quantitative parameter estimation. This allows accurate tissue property measurement to be achieved in fewer scans by having the optimization prepared in advance, thus reducing acquisition time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Systematic variation of acquisition parameters according to optimized sequences enables efficient sampling of the signal space, providing accurate quantitative measurements without requiring excessively long scan times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If MRF techniques aim to achieve high spatial resolution, then image quality is improved, but SNR efficiency decreases and acquisition time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidSNR efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes acquisition parameters specifically to improve SNR efficiency for high-resolution imaging. By adjusting flip angles, repetition times, and echo times in the fingerprinting sequence, the method maintains adequate SNR even when acquiring high-resolution data, thus resolving the contradiction between resolution and SNR efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If conventional MRF uses simple template-matching reconstruction with incoherently-sampled data, then reconstruction complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of T2 maps deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconstruction complexityVSAvoidT2 map accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies acquisition parameters to specifically enhance T2 measurement precision. By optimizing the variation of echo times and other parameters in the fingerprinting sequence, the method improves T2 map accuracy while maintaining the computational efficiency of template-matching reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances the accuracy and efficiency of T2 map estimation while maintaining T1 map accuracy, reducing imaging time, and improving robustness to motion, thereby advancing the utility of MRF for high-resolution quantitative MR imaging.

Implementation Method 1

Magnetic resonance imaging ('MRI') is a technique that finds wide and diverse use in clinical medicine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

radio frequency ('RF') pulse phase, TR, echo time ('TE'), and k-space trajectories

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency excitation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10241173B2Systems and methods for designing magnetic resonance fingerprinting imaging parameters
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORP
  • US10241173B2 patent drawing
  • US10241173B2 patent drawing
  • US10241173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for acquiring magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) imaging data from a subject using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system are provided. The method includes receiving an indication of an MRF imaging process to be performed by the MRI system and receiving a desired design objective for the MRF imaging process and a configuration metric associated with the MRF imaging process. The method further includes using the configuration metric to bound a variance of tissue parameter estimates associated with the MRF imaging process and determine imaging parameters that achieve the desired design objective. The method also includes performing the MRF imaging process using the determined imaging parameters to acquire MRF data using the MRI system.