MRF Joystick Feedback for Virtual Boundary Implement Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing work vehicle joystick systems lack effective means to provide precise and safe control of implement movement, particularly in dynamic environments, leading to potential breaches of virtual boundaries and collisions with obstacles.

Innovation Solution

A magnetorheological fluid (MRF) joystick system that includes a joystick device, an MRF resistance mechanism, and a controller architecture, which tracks implement movement relative to virtual boundaries and adjusts MRF resistance forces to prevent breaches, providing tactile feedback to operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional joystick systems are used without MRF resistance mechanism, then the device complexity is low, but the operator awareness and precision in controlling implement movement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision in controlling implement movementVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical resistance mechanisms with a magnetorheological fluid-based resistance mechanism. The MRF resistance mechanism uses magnetic fields to control fluid viscosity and generate resistance forces, eliminating complex mechanical linkages and providing smoother, more precise control. This substitution improves measurement precision while actually reducing mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetorheological fluid as an intermediary between the operator's joystick input and the implement movement. The MRF acts as a smart material that translates electrical control signals into variable resistance forces, providing tactile feedback and precision control without direct mechanical coupling. This intermediary approach enhances control precision while keeping the system architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If MRF resistance mechanism is added to provide tactile feedback, then operator awareness improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator awarenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback system where the MRF resistance mechanism provides real-time tactile feedback to the operator based on implement position relative to virtual boundaries. The controller continuously monitors implement position and adjusts MRF resistance forces accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that enhances operator awareness and reliability without requiring complex additional sensing or actuation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the rheological parameters of the magnetorheological fluid dynamically based on control requirements. By adjusting magnetic field strength, the system varies the fluid's viscosity and resistance characteristics in real-time, providing adaptive tactile feedback. This parameter-based control approach achieves reliable operator awareness through software-controlled material properties rather than complex mechanical adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If MRF resistance forces are varied to prevent boundary breaches, then safety improves, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiduse of energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing virtual boundaries beforehand and using the MRF resistance mechanism to prevent boundary breaches before they occur. The system proactively generates resistance forces when the implement approaches virtual boundaries, rather than reacting after a breach occurs. This preventive approach enhances safety while minimizing energy consumption by only activating resistance forces when needed near boundary conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances operator awareness and precision in controlling implement movement, reducing the likelihood of unintended movements and collisions by intelligently varying MRF resistance forces based on proximity to virtual boundaries, ensuring safer and more efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

an MRF resistance mechanism controllable to selectively resist movement of the joystick relative to the base housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetorheological fluid effect: Magnetorheological Fluid

Data Source

PatentUS11499293B2Work vehicle magnetorheological fluid joystick systems providing implement command guidance
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 DEERE & CO
  • US11499293B2 patent drawing
  • US11499293B2 patent drawing
  • US11499293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In embodiments, a work vehicle magnetorheological fluid (MRF) joystick system includes a joystick device, an MRF joystick resistance mechanism, a controller architecture, and an implement tracking data source configured to track movement of the implement during operation of the work vehicle. The joystick device includes, in turn, a base housing, a joystick, and a joystick position sensor. The MRF joystick resistance mechanism is controllable to vary an MRF resistance force impeding joystick movement relative to the base housing. The controller architecture is configured to: (i) track movement of the implement relative to a virtual boundary utilizing data provided by the implement tracking data source; and (ii) command the MRF joystick resistance mechanism to vary the MRF resistance force based, at least in part, on implement movement relative to the virtual boundary.