Magnetorheological Joystick Return-to-Center Rate Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-centering joystick devices in work vehicles lack the ability to control the return-to-center (RTC) rate, leading to discrepancies between joystick motion and implement movement during automatic positioning functions, causing operator confusion and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

The work vehicle magnetorheological fluid (MRF) joystick system introduces a controller architecture that varies the MRF resistance force to modify the RTC rate of the joystick, ensuring it corresponds with the implement's movement during auto-positioning functions, thereby maintaining a harmonious relationship between joystick motion and implement movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a self-centering joystick device is used in work vehicles, then the joystick automatically returns to the centered position, but the return-to-center rate cannot be controlled, causing discrepancies between joystick motion and implement movement during automatic positioning functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic return to centerVSAvoidreturn-to-center rate control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the joystick resistance mechanism adjustable and controllable. The MRF resistance mechanism dynamically modifies the resistive force applied to the joystick during return-to-center motion, allowing the RTC rate to be varied in real-time based on operational mode and implement movement characteristics, transforming a static self-centering mechanism into a dynamic, adaptive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the MRF fluid's resistance characteristics through controlled variation of magnetic field strength. The controller adjusts the MRF resistance force parameter based on detected operational conditions, enabling the RTC rate to correspond with implement movement during automatic positioning functions while maintaining standard self-centering behavior during manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the joystick returns quickly to the centered position, then operational efficiency is improved, but operator confusion increases during automatic positioning functions due to mismatched motion correspondence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidmotion correspondence feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the controller to detect operational mode and implement movement characteristics, then adjusting the MRF resistance force accordingly. During automatic positioning functions, the system provides feedback-controlled resistance modulation that ensures the joystick's return-to-center motion corresponds with the implement's movement, maintaining intuitive motion correspondence while enabling quick return when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic control of MRF resistance allows the system to adapt the RTC rate to match implement movement during automatic positioning, preserving motion correspondence feedback. The resistive force is dynamically adjusted based on real-time operational conditions, enabling the joystick to provide accurate motion feedback during automated operations while maintaining high operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If magnetorheological fluid resistance mechanism is added to control RTC rate, then adaptability and operator experience are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn-to-center rate controlVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical resistance mechanisms with a magnetorheological fluid-based system. Instead of using complex mechanical linkages, springs, or friction devices to control RTC rate, the invention uses MRF's ability to change viscosity under magnetic field influence. This substitution reduces mechanical complexity while providing electronically controllable, adaptive resistance modulation through the MRF joystick resistance mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The MRF resistance mechanism enables parameter changes in resistive force without adding complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms. The controller electronically modulates the magnetic field strength applied to the MRF fluid, changing its resistance parameter on demand. This approach provides adaptive RTC rate control with simplified architecture compared to traditional mechanical adjustment systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances operator experience by reducing confusion and improving efficiency during automatic positioning tasks, as the joystick returns to the centered position at a rate that mirrors the implement's movement, maintaining a consistent and intuitive control interface.

Implementation Method 1

work vehicle magnetorheological fluid (MRF) joystick systems operable in modified centering modes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetorheological fluid: Magnetorheological Fluid

Data Source

PatentUS11681320B2Work vehicle magnetorheological fluid joystick systems operable in modified centering modes
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 DEERE & CO
  • US11681320B2 patent drawing
  • US11681320B2 patent drawing
  • US11681320B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In embodiments, a work vehicle magnetorheological fluid (MRF) joystick system includes a joystick device, an MRF joystick resistance mechanism, and a controller architecture. The joystick device includes, in turn, a base housing, a joystick movably mounted to the base housing, and a joystick bias mechanism coupled to the joystick and exerting a centering force urging the joystick to return to the centered position when moved therefrom. The controller architecture is operable in a modified centering mode in which the controller architecture: (i) determines when the joystick begins return toward the centered position due to the centering force applied by the joystick bias mechanism; and (ii) when so determining, commands the MRF joystick resistance mechanism to modify a rate at which the joystick returns to the centered position by varying the MRF resistance force applied to the joystick.