Markov Random Field Translation Model Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional statistical machine translation systems face limitations in incorporating arbitrary features and optimizing translation scores, leading to suboptimal performance in generating accurate translations between languages.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a Markov random field (MRF)-based translation model that allows for the incorporation of arbitrary features and uses stochastic gradient ascent with an N-best list based expected Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) as an objective function for parameter estimation, enhancing the scoring of phrase translation pairs and improving translation quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional counting-based techniques are used for parameter estimation, then the system is simple to implement, but the translation quality and scoring accuracy are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation qualityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the translation model from conventional counting-based parameters to Markov random field parameters with arbitrary features. The MRF framework introduces new parameter types (feature weights, clique potentials) that enable more expressive translation scoring while maintaining a structured approach to parameter estimation through gradient-based optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The MRF-based translation model provides a universal framework that can incorporate multiple types of features (lexical, syntactic, semantic, contextual) within a single unified scoring mechanism. This multi-functional approach replaces multiple separate scoring models with one flexible system that adapts to different feature types through parameter learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If arbitrary features are incorporated into the translation model, then the translation scoring becomes more accurate, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation scoring accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational task by decomposing the translation scoring into local clique potentials within the MRF framework. Each feature contributes through localized interactions rather than global computation, and the training process processes features in discrete gradient update steps, making the complexity manageable through structured decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs N-best list based expected BLEU as an objective function that focuses computational effort on the most promising translation hypotheses rather than evaluating all possible translations. This partial action approach concentrates computational resources on improving the top candidates, achieving high accuracy without exhaustive computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If stochastic gradient ascent with N-best list based expected BLEU is used for parameter estimation, then the translation performance improves by 0.8-1.3 BLEU points, but the training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation performanceVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous gradient ascent optimization that iteratively refines parameters using gradient information from the expected BLEU objective function. This continuous improvement process systematically climbs the performance landscape, achieving steady gains in BLEU score through repeated small updates rather than discrete large-step adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary feature extraction and N-best list generation before the actual parameter optimization. By preparing the training data and candidate translations in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during the gradient ascent process, allowing faster convergence to high-performance models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10025778B2Training markov random field-based translation models using gradient ascent
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10025778B2 patent drawing
  • US10025778B2 patent drawing
  • US10025778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various technologies described herein pertain to training and utilizing a general, statistical framework for modeling translation via Markov random fields (MRFs). An MRF-based translation model can be employed in a statistical machine translation (SMT) system. The MRF-based translation model allows for arbitrary features extracted from a phrase pair to be incorporated as evidence. The parameters of the model are estimated using a large-scale discriminative training approach based on stochastic gradient ascent and an N-best list based expected Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) as an objective function.