MRI Susceptibility Artifact Correction via Iterative B0 Field Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional MRI systems fail to accurately classify constituent materials like air, bone, and metal, leading to signal loss, geometric distortion, and inaccurate diagnostic information due to magnetic susceptibility artifacts, which hinders the use of MRI data for precise PET attenuation correction and biochemical investigations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that reconstructs MR images and B0 field maps to iteratively identify and label ambiguous constituent materials, assigning susceptibility values and generating simulated B0 field maps to match measured maps, thereby correcting MRI data and improving diagnostic assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional MRI pulse sequences are used to image regions including air, bone, and metal, then the imaging process is simple and fast, but the signal intensity is indistinct and classification accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging speedVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments the classification process into multiple stages: initial classification of bright regions, iterative labeling of dark regions, and refinement through B0 field map comparison. This multi-stage segmentation allows accurate classification of ambiguous materials without requiring complex pulse sequences for each material type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces B0 field maps as an intermediary tool to resolve ambiguities in classifying dark regions. By comparing measured B0 field maps with simulated maps for different material hypotheses, the system can accurately distinguish between air, bone, and metal without using specialized pulse sequences for each material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If conventional MRI classification methods are used to differentiate air, bone, and metal, then the classification process is straightforward, but accuracy deteriorates due to signal loss from magnetic susceptibility artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification complexityVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by iteratively comparing simulated B0 field maps (generated from current classification hypotheses) with measured B0 field maps. This feedback loop refines the classification of dark regions, correcting misclassifications caused by magnetic susceptibility artifacts while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary classification of bright regions before addressing dark regions. This preliminary action establishes a foundation for the iterative refinement process, allowing the system to focus computational resources on resolving ambiguous areas without reprocessing the entire image from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If MRI data is used for PET attenuation correction without accurate material classification, then the process is simple, but diagnostic accuracy deteriorates due to incorrect attenuation values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidPET attenuation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual or simple automated classification methods with an iterative computational approach using B0 field map comparison. This substitution enables accurate material classification (distinguishing air, bone, metal) required for correct PET attenuation values, while the automated nature maintains process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables accurate localization and identification of metal objects and other materials, reducing susceptibility-related artifacts, and facilitating the selection of optimized MRI pulse sequences for improved imaging quality and accurate PET attenuation value estimation.

Implementation Method 1

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high-quality images with excellent soft-tissue contrast

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance:

Implementation Method 2

presence of metals in an imaged region may cause significant resonant frequency changes during MRI, thereby resulting in substantial signal loss

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic susceptibility:

Data Source

PatentUS10436858B2Method and system for improved classification of constituent materials
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US10436858B2 patent drawing
  • US10436858B2 patent drawing
  • US10436858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imaging system and method are disclosed. An MR image and measured B0 field map of a target volume in a subject are reconstructed, where the MR image includes one or more bright and/or dark regions. One or more distinctive constituent materials corresponding to the bright regions are identified. Each dark region is iteratively labeled as one or more ambiguous constituent materials. Susceptibility values corresponding to each distinctive and iteratively labeled ambiguous constituent material is assigned. A simulated B0 field map is iteratively generated based on the assigned susceptibility values. A similarity metric is determined between the measured and simulated B0 field maps. Constituent materials are identified in the dark regions based on the similarity metric to ascertain corresponding susceptibility values. The MRI data is corrected based on the assigned and ascertained susceptibility values. A diagnostic assessment of the target volume is determined based on the corrected MRI data.