MRI Radial Sampling Blade Shift Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current MRI techniques using radial sampling methods fail to accurately correct positional relationships between blades in k-space, leading to artifacts and uneven brightness due to undistinguished static and dynamic errors, especially in regions with low static magnetic field homogeneity and local sensitivity distributions of reception RF coils.

Innovation Solution

The method involves pre-measurement to separate factors shifting echo signal positions in k-space, calculating and applying shift amounts for each blade, using readout gradient magnetic field pulses with varying polarities to correct for dynamic errors, and reflecting these corrections in the reconstruction process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If radial sampling method is used to acquire images, then imaging speed and coverage are improved, but artifacts and uneven brightness occur due to improper positional relationship between blades in k-space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing pre-measurement to calculate shift amounts before actual image acquisition. The system measures and stores correction values for static errors in advance, then applies these corrections during the radial sampling process to prevent artifacts and uneven brightness while maintaining high imaging speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the calculated shift amounts from pre-measurement to correct the positional relationships of blades in k-space during image reconstruction. The system continuously refines the positioning of radial samples based on measured deviations, ensuring accurate blade alignment and eliminating artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If shift amount calculation is performed without distinguishing static and dynamic errors, then processing complexity is reduced, but correction accuracy deteriorates leading to inappropriate positional relationships between blades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidshift amount accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the total shift amount into two distinct components: static error (common to all blades) and dynamic error (specific to each blade). This segmentation allows the system to calculate and correct each type of error separately using appropriate methods, significantly improving correction accuracy while managing processing complexity through structured separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by applying different correction strategies to different types of errors. Static errors are corrected using a global shift amount calculated from phase distribution, while dynamic errors are corrected using blade-specific shift amounts. This localized approach ensures each error type receives the most appropriate correction method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If conventional shift correction method is applied in regions with low static magnetic field homogeneity, then processing time is reduced, but artifact generation increases due to dominant static errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidartifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing pre-measurement in regions with low static magnetic field homogeneity to accurately characterize static errors before image acquisition. The system stores correction values for these regions and applies them during reconstruction, preventing artifact generation while maintaining efficient processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using measured static error characteristics from pre-measurement to continuously correct blade positioning in regions with low magnetic field homogeneity. This feedback mechanism ensures that dominant static errors are properly compensated, eliminating artifacts while maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Area of stationary object

If radial sampling is performed with multiple blades, then k-space coverage is improved, but positional relationship errors between blades increase leading to image quality deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvek-space coverageVSAvoidpositional relationship accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by calculating shift amounts for each blade based on phase distribution measurements and using these corrections to adjust blade positions in k-space during reconstruction. This feedback mechanism ensures that even with multiple blades covering extensive k-space areas, the positional relationships remain accurate and artifacts are minimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the acquisition of high-quality images even in challenging conditions by accurately correcting positional relationships and reducing artifacts and uneven brightness.

Implementation Method 1

The readout gradient magnetic field pulse generates a magnetic field gradient in an arbitrary direction in order to generate a magnetic field intensity gradient in the static magnetic field space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field gradient: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The MRI apparatus is an apparatus that measures an NMR signal generated by atomic nucleus spin comprising tissue of an object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNuclear magnetic resonance:

Implementation Method 3

Since the atomic nucleus spin performs precession at a frequency according to a gradient magnetic field intensity and the magnetic rotation ratio

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLarmor precession: Precession

Implementation Method 4

an echo signal can be decomposed into a component of each frequency i.e., position by measuring an NMR signal (echo signal) in a state where a readout gradient magnetic field pulse was applied to perform frequency analysis represented by the Fourier transform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFourier transform:

Data Source

PatentUS10031205B2Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and magnetic resonance imaging method
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US10031205B2 patent drawing
  • US10031205B2 patent drawing
  • US10031205B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention obtains high-quality images even in a case of measurement with a radial sampling method. For this purpose, pre-measurement is performed to extract only a component different for each blade from among shift amounts from among echo signals, and a shift amount in k-space of an echo signal by the said component is reflected to a reconstruction process. In the pre-measurement, echo signals are obtained respectively by applying readout gradient magnetic field pulses that change the polarity to the positive and negative and that have the same pulse shape as readout gradient magnetic field pulses to be used in an image acquisition sequence. A shift amount is obtained for each axis of X, Y, and Z of an MRI apparatus as a variation amount of a phase difference between both the echo signals.