MRI Protocol Optimization via Bloch Equation Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current MRI protocols often fail to optimize image quality and diagnostic sensitivity due to limitations in k-space strategy and acquisition train length, leading to suboptimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), especially in complex imaging sequences like MPRAGE and FLASH.

Innovation Solution

The method involves optimizing MRI scanner settings, acquisition train length, and k-space strategies using Bloch Equations to simulate and determine optimal imaging parameters, such as repetition time, echo time, and flip angle, to maximize SNR, CNR, and contrast efficiency, while minimizing artifacts, thereby enhancing image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional MRI protocols are used with fixed k-space strategies and acquisition train lengths, then the imaging process is simple and fast to set up, but the signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidprotocol optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation of the MRI acquisition process using Bloch Equations before actual imaging to predict optimal acquisition train lengths and k-space strategies. This pre-computation allows the system to establish optimized parameters in advance, avoiding the need for trial-and-error adjustments during actual scanning and thereby improving SNR without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where simulation results from Bloch Equation calculations inform the selection of acquisition parameters, which are then refined based on predicted image quality metrics. This iterative optimization process uses feedback from simulated performance to adjust acquisition train lengths and k-space sampling strategies, systematically improving SNR and CNR while managing protocol complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If longer acquisition train lengths are used to improve image quality, then the signal-to-noise ratio increases, but the acquisition time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrast-to-noise ratioVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the optimal acquisition train length by simulating different lengths using Bloch Equations and selecting the length that maximizes contrast-to-noise ratio while minimizing acquisition time. This dynamic optimization allows the system to adapt the acquisition train length to specific imaging requirements, tissue properties, and sequence parameters, achieving high CNR without unnecessarily extending scan time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key acquisition parameters such as acquisition train length, echo spacing, and flip angle based on simulation results to optimize the balance between image quality and acquisition time. By systematically varying these parameters in simulations and selecting the optimal combination, the system achieves high CNR efficiency without excessive time penalties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If optimized k-space strategies are implemented to improve image quality, then the diagnostic sensitivity increases, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic sensitivityVSAvoidk-space optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation of different k-space sampling strategies using Bloch Equations to predict their impact on image quality and diagnostic sensitivity before actual acquisition. This pre-computation identifies optimal k-space trajectories and sampling patterns, allowing the system to implement effective strategies without requiring complex real-time decision-making during scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simplified models and simulations (copies of the actual imaging process) to evaluate k-space strategies without requiring full-scale implementation. By creating virtual representations of different acquisition scenarios and testing them in simulation, the system can identify effective strategies and transfer the learned parameters to actual imaging, reducing the computational burden of optimizing complex k-space patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If multiple imaging parameters are optimized simultaneously, then the overall image quality improves, but the optimization process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidoptimization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the optimization process into distinct components: first optimizing acquisition train length, then k-space strategy, and finally other imaging parameters such as echo time and flip angle. Each parameter set is optimized in sequence based on simulation results from previous steps, breaking down the complex multi-parameter optimization into manageable stages while achieving overall image quality improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary optimization of critical parameters like acquisition train length and k-space strategy using Bloch Equation simulations before fine-tuning other imaging parameters. This staged approach allows the system to establish the most impactful parameters first, then refine secondary parameters, systematically improving image quality while managing optimization complexity through structured progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in significantly improved SNR and CNR efficiencies, leading to higher quality MRI images with better diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, particularly for neonatal and adult brain imaging, as demonstrated by in vivo results showing increased contrast efficiency and reduced high spatial frequency components.

Implementation Method 1

using Bloch Equations to simulate and determine optimal imaging parameters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBloch Equations:

Implementation Method 2

a radio frequency (RF) excitation field with the same frequency as the Larmor frequency of the nucleus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLarmor frequency:

Implementation Method 3

the object/subject examined is positioned in a homogeneous static magnetic field so that the object's nuclear spins generate net magnetization oriented along the static magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

The net magnetization is rotated away from the static magnetic field using a radio frequency (RF) excitation field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRF excitation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10444311B2Methods and devices for optimizing magnetic resonance imaging protocols
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 OHIO STATE INNOVATION FOUND
  • US10444311B2 patent drawing
  • US10444311B2 patent drawing
  • US10444311B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for optimizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols are described herein. An example method can include receiving one or more MRI scanner settings for an imaging sequence; selecting at least one objective function from a plurality of objective functions; selecting an acquisition train length; selecting a k-space strategy; selecting one or more imaging parameters; and acquiring a magnetic resonance (MR) image using at least one of an optimized k-space strategy, an optimized acquisition train length, or optimized imaging parameters.