Gradient Delay Correction in MRI via Partition Interpolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for gradient delay time correction in magnetic resonance imaging require additional recording time for calibration data, which can be inefficient and affect image quality due to spatially varying eddy currents.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that employs acceleration techniques during the recording of calibration data in the partition direction, allowing for reduced resolution in partition direction and interpolation to provide correction data for all partitions, thereby reducing the recording time while maintaining high-quality gradient delay correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If calibration data is recorded for all partitions in partition direction, then gradient delay correction quality is improved, but recording time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradient delay correction qualityVSAvoidrecording time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by recording calibration data for only a subset of partitions (e.g., every fourth partition) rather than all partitions. This reduces the recording time while maintaining sufficient correction quality through interpolation of the missing correction values from the recorded partitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses interpolation to copy and estimate correction values for partitions where calibration data was not recorded. By calculating correction values from recorded partitions and interpolating them to unrecorded partitions, the system maintains correction quality without requiring direct measurement of all partitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If resolution in partition direction is reduced for calibration data, then recording time is reduced, but correction precision for all partitions may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording efficiencyVSAvoidcorrection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent copies correction information from partitions with high-resolution calibration data to partitions with reduced resolution. Through interpolation, correction values are estimated and applied to all partitions, ensuring that even partitions with reduced measurement precision receive accurate correction data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the resolution parameter for calibration data recording in the partition direction, using lower resolution for calibration while maintaining high resolution for actual magnetic resonance data acquisition. This parameter adjustment optimizes the balance between recording efficiency and correction quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If interpolation is used to provide correction data for all partitions, then recording time is reduced, but correction accuracy for unrecorded partitions may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration recording timeVSAvoidcorrection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses interpolation to copy correction patterns from recorded partitions to unrecorded partitions. By analyzing the correction values from measured partitions and extrapolating the correction pattern, the system generates accurate correction data for all partitions without requiring direct measurement of each one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of physically recording calibration data for every partition with a computational interpolation method. This substitution uses mathematical algorithms to estimate correction values, achieving both time efficiency and maintained accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the spatially varying eddy current effects, improving the image quality of magnetic resonance data by allowing for time-efficient and high-quality gradient delay correction.

Implementation Method 1

Eddy currents that are generated by gradient pulses can result in temporally and spatially variable field interferences in magnetic resonance devices. Eddy currents that generate a spatially variable magnetic field in the direction of a readout gradient can have an influence on the actual echo time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

Eddy currents that are generated by gradient pulses can result in temporally and spatially variable field interferences

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250085374A1Computer-Implemented Method for Gradient Delay Time Correction, Magnetic Resonance Device, Computer Program and Electronically Readable Data Medium
Publication Date: 2025.03.13 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US20250085374A1 patent drawing
  • US20250085374A1 patent drawing
  • US20250085374A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to gradient delay time correction of magnetic resonance data. For recording the magnetic resonance data, use is made of a three-dimensional recording technique with linear recording trajectories oriented in different readout directions of a readout plane that is perpendicular to a partition direction. Calibration data is recorded which covers a plurality of partitions in partition direction and which describes readout-direction-dependent shifts, caused by delay effects, of measurement points, e.g. sampled k-space sections in the k-space. Correction data is determined by evaluating the calibration data, and the magnetic resonance data is corrected on the basis of the correction data in order to compensate for the delay effects. The calibration data, which covers a coverage region in partition direction, is recorded in a resolved manner in partition direction, and at least one acceleration technique is applied in the partition direction during the recording of the calibration data.