MRI Gradient Pre-emphasis for Eddy Current Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pre-emphasis techniques are ineffective in correcting short-time constant eddy currents in MRI systems, particularly for non-Cartesian acquisitions like spiral sequences, due to difficulties in accurately measuring these short time constants, and fail to address non-linear gradient amplifier responses.

Innovation Solution

Calculating impulse response functions from measured magnetic field perturbations using a magnetic field camera with probes, and incorporating these into a pre-emphasized gradient waveform to correct distortions caused by eddy currents, ensuring RF samples for MRI image reconstruction remain identical to those from an uncorrected gradient.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional pre-emphasis techniques are used to correct eddy currents, then long-time constant eddy currents can be corrected, but short-time constant eddy currents cannot be accurately corrected due to measurement difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precision of eddy current time constantsVSAvoidcorrection effectiveness for short-time constant eddy currents
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the actual gradient waveform using a probe before applying pre-emphasis correction. This preliminary action captures the true temporal characteristics including short-time constant components, enabling accurate correction that was previously unmeasurable. The measured waveform serves as the basis for calculating impulse response functions that accurately represent the gradient amplifier's actual behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses measured gradient waveforms as feedback to continuously refine the pre-emphasis correction. By comparing the actual measured gradient waveform with the desired waveform, the system calculates impulse response functions that capture both long and short time constant behaviors. This feedback loop enables accurate characterization and correction of short-time constant eddy currents that were previously invisible to measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If conventional pre-emphasis techniques are used, then correction can be applied, but non-linear gradient amplifier responses are not addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracy for non-linear responsesVSAvoidcomplexity of handling non-linear amplifier behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical/electrical gradient amplifier system's non-linear behavior with a mathematical model based on measured impulse response functions. By measuring the actual gradient waveform and deriving impulse response functions through spectral analysis, the system creates a computational representation of the non-linear amplifier behavior. This allows the non-linear effects to be corrected through digital signal processing rather than requiring complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the gradient waveform parameters through pre-emphasis filtering using impulse response functions. By changing the temporal parameters of the gradient waveform through convolution with the measured impulse response, the system compensates for non-linear amplifier behavior. The pre-emphasized waveform parameters are specifically designed to counteract the anticipated non-linear distortions, resulting in a corrected actual gradient waveform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If gradient waveform correction is applied, then eddy current distortions are reduced, but RF sample grid alignment may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of gradient waveform correctionVSAvoidRF sample grid misalignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from measured gradient waveforms to calculate pre-emphasis corrections that maintain RF sample grid alignment. By measuring the actual gradient waveform and comparing it with the desired waveform, the system determines the precise correction needed while monitoring its effect on the RF sampling grid. This feedback ensures that corrections are applied in a way that preserves the relationship between gradient timing and RF sample acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system carefully adjusts gradient waveform parameters through pre-emphasis while maintaining the temporal relationships critical for RF sampling. The impulse response functions are designed to correct eddy current distortions without altering the overall timing structure that determines RF sample grid positions. Parameter changes are applied selectively to frequency components that cause eddy currents while preserving the timing information needed for accurate image reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces distortions from eddy currents, maintaining the integrity of RF samples and image quality, even in non-Cartesian acquisitions, by accurately accounting for short-time constant and non-linear responses.

Implementation Method 1

driving the gradient sub-system of the MRI system using an input such that a gradient corresponding to perturbations to the substantially uniform magnetic field are generated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

distortions caused by eddy currents are substantially removed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

a main magnet that generates a substantially uniform magnetic field to image a subject placed therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10324156B2System and method to correct eddy current artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 SYNAPTIVE MEDICAL INC
  • US10324156B2 patent drawing
  • US10324156B2 patent drawing
  • US10324156B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some implementations provide a MRI system configured to: access data encoding an input gradient waveform that would otherwise be used on a gradient sub-system of the MRI system to generate a gradient that corresponds to perturbations to the substantially uniform magnetic field; access data encoding a forward impulse response function and an inverse impulse response function, both characterizing a gradient generated from a target impulse input; pre-emphasizing the input gradient waveform by using both the forward impulse response function and the reverse impulse response function; and drive the gradient sub-system using the pre-emphasized gradient waveform such that distortions to the gradient caused by eddy currents within the gradient sub-system are substantially removed while radio-frequency (RF) samples for reconstructing an MRI image are being acquired from a grid that is substantially identical to when gradient sub-system is driven using the input gradient waveform.