Digital Image Segmentation for MRI Background Noise Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Digital images, especially those from MRI scans, suffer from background noise that distracts observers and reduces image quality, as signal intensity variations occur in background regions where it should be zero.

Innovation Solution

The method separates digital images into foreground, background, and transition regions, using techniques like thresholding and gradient-constrained hysteresis thresholding to process each region separately, suppressing background noise and improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by reducing pixel intensities in the background regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If background regions are processed to reduce noise, then image quality and signal-to-noise ratio are improved, but background intensity variations may cause artifacts to be mistakenly suppressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidartifact suppression accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The image is segmented into foreground, background, and transition regions using gradient-constrained hysteresis thresholding. This segmentation allows different processing strategies to be applied to each region, improving noise suppression in background areas while preserving foreground objects and avoiding artifact suppression at boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing approaches are applied to different regions of the image. The background region undergoes aggressive noise suppression, the foreground region is preserved, and the transition region uses gradient constraints to maintain boundary integrity. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by adapting processing intensity to regional characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If aggressive noise suppression is applied to background regions, then background noise is reduced, but foreground objects may be inadvertently affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackground noiseVSAvoidforeground object integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into foreground, background, and transition regions through gradient-constrained hysteresis thresholding. This segmentation ensures that aggressive noise suppression is applied only to the background region where it is safe, while the foreground region is protected from such processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing intensity is locally adapted based on region classification. Background regions receive strong noise suppression, foreground regions are preserved with minimal processing, and transition regions use gradient constraints to prevent foreground objects from being affected by background processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If simple thresholding is used to separate foreground and background, then processing speed is improved, but transition regions with gradient variations are misclassified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidregion classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The image is segmented into three distinct regions (foreground, background, transition) using gradient-constrained hysteresis thresholding. This segmentation method improves upon simple thresholding by incorporating gradient information to accurately identify transition regions, thereby improving classification accuracy without sacrificing processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing approach changes from simple intensity thresholding to gradient-constrained hysteresis thresholding. This parameter change incorporates gradient magnitude and direction into the thresholding process, enabling accurate identification of transition regions while maintaining computational efficiency through the hysteresis mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If uniform processing is applied to the entire image, then processing simplicity is maintained, but background noise and foreground details cannot be differentially optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing algorithmVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The image is segmented into foreground, background, and transition regions, enabling differential processing optimization. This segmentation adds moderate complexity but delivers significant image quality improvements by allowing tailored processing strategies for each region type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing optimizations are applied to different regions: aggressive noise suppression in background areas, preservation of fine details in foreground regions, and gradient-constrained processing in transition zones. This local quality approach justifies the increased processing complexity by delivering superior overall image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7623728B2Method and product for processing digital images
Publication Date: 2009.11.24 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US7623728B2 patent drawing
  • US7623728B2 patent drawing
  • US7623728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and computer program product for processing a digital image is disclosed. A foreground region relating to an imaged object is estimated, a background region relating to other than the imaged object is estimated, and by using the image, the estimated foreground region and the estimated background region, a transition region disposed between the foreground region and the background region is calculated. The estimated foreground region, the estimated background region, and the calculated transition region, each include a separate set of pixels that may each be processed separately for suppressing pixel intensities in the estimated background region and improving image quality.