MRI K-Space Augmentation for Motion-Corrected Image Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to subject movement during data acquisition lead to image blurring and artifacts, which existing motion correction techniques like PROPELLER, navigator-based, and self-navigation methods struggle to fully address, especially in reconstructing images with varying tissue contrast modalities.

Innovation Solution

An image reconstruction method that utilizes a magnetic resonance modality conversion neural network to generate synthetic k-space data, augmenting sparse regions in motion-corrected k-space data with synthetic data of the desired tissue contrast modality, enhancing image quality through techniques like compressed sensing and optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If motion correction techniques like PROPELLER or navigator-based methods are used, then motion artifacts are reduced, but image quality in sparse k-space regions remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion artifactsVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

A neural network is introduced as an intermediary to generate synthetic k-space data that fills sparse regions. The neural network takes fully sampled k-space data as input and produces synthetic k-space data with matching anatomical structures, which then complements the motion-corrected but sparse k-space data to reconstruct high-quality images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The method merges motion-corrected sparse k-space data with synthetic k-space data generated by the neural network. By combining these two data sources in the k-space domain and reconstructing together, the approach achieves both motion artifact reduction and high image quality in sparse regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If traditional Cartesian sampling is used, then data acquisition is straightforward, but subject movement during acquisition causes blurring and artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata acquisitionVSAvoidimage blurring
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The k-space data is segmented into fully sampled regions and sparse regions. The fully sampled regions are used to train and generate synthetic data, while the sparse regions are filled using the neural network's output. This segmentation allows the system to leverage both traditional and AI-based approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network learns to copy anatomical structures from fully sampled k-space data and reproduces them in the synthetic k-space data. This copying mechanism preserves anatomical accuracy while enabling fast acquisition with reduced susceptibility to motion artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If k-space data is acquired quickly to reduce scan time, then productivity increases, but sparse k-space regions result in poor image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional mechanical approach of acquiring complete k-space data is replaced with an AI-based system. The neural network substitutes for the physical measurement process in sparse regions, generating synthetic data that would otherwise require time-consuming acquisition, thus maintaining high image quality while enabling faster scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The sampling density parameter is changed across different k-space regions. Fully sampled regions maintain high density for accurate neural network training and reference, while sparse regions use reduced sampling that is compensated by synthetic data generation, achieving overall faster acquisition without quality loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4707843A1Improving image quality in motion corrected magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP4707843A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4707843A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4707843A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed herein is an image reconstruction method of reconstructing an augmented magnetic resonance image (310). The method comprises receiving (500) motion corrected k-space data (102) having a first tissue contrast modality; identifying (502) sparse k-space regions (104) within the motion corrected k-space data; receiving (504) an alternative magnetic resonance image (300) with a second tissue contrast modality. The method further comprises generating (506) a synthetic magnetic resonance image (302) which has the first tissue contrast modality in response to inputting the alternative magnetic resonance image into a magnetic resonance modality conversion neural network (312) and generating (508) synthetic k-space data from the synthetic magnetic resonance image. An augmented magnetic resonance image is reconstructed (510) by using the motion corrected k-space data such that the sparse k-space regions of the motion-corrected k-space data are augmented with the synthetic k-space data. Systems are presented that are configured to perform the method.