Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI K-Space Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) techniques face challenges in achieving high spatial and temporal resolution while minimizing noise enhancement and aliasing artifacts.

Innovation Solution

The method involves dividing the k-space into a central and peripheral region, using a 3D k-space trajectory with wave-encoded gradient echoes for controlled aliasing in all three dimensions, and employing a low-rank plus sparse (L+S) reconstruction technique to reconstruct magnetic resonance images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional Cartesian k-space trajectories are used in TWIST imaging, then the acquisition scheme is simple to implement, but the temporal resolution is limited and noise enhancement occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal resolutionVSAvoidk-space trajectory complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The k-space is segmented into a central region and multiple peripheral regions, which are acquired in an alternating fashion. This segmentation allows for more flexible sampling strategies that can improve temporal resolution while managing complexity through structured organization of the acquisition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from conventional 2D Cartesian k-space trajectories to 3D non-Cartesian trajectories. This dimensional change enables more efficient sampling patterns that can achieve higher temporal resolution by better utilizing the available k-space coverage during the dynamic contrast enhancement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If undersampling is performed to increase temporal resolution, then the acquisition speed improves, but aliasing artifacts and noise enhancement occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal resolutionVSAvoidaliasing artifacts and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Parallel imaging techniques are introduced as an intermediary method to handle the effects of undersampling. By using multiple receiver coils with different sensitivity profiles, the system can reconstruct images that mitigate aliasing artifacts and reduce noise enhancement, allowing undersampling to be performed without the typical detrimental effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the sampling parameters by using non-uniform sampling patterns and varying the density of k-space coverage across different time points. This parameter optimization allows for efficient undersampling that maintains image quality by concentrating sampling efforts where most information is needed while reducing redundant measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If parallel imaging techniques are applied to control aliasing, then the image quality improves, but the reconstruction complexity and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidreconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Coil sensitivity information is acquired and stored in advance during a calibration phase before the actual dynamic imaging. This preliminary action allows the reconstruction algorithm to use pre-computed sensitivity profiles, significantly reducing the computational complexity during the actual imaging and reconstruction process while maintaining the benefits of parallel imaging for aliasing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If 3D k-space coverage is acquired to improve spatial resolution, then the anatomical detail improves, but the acquisition time increases beyond the limited contrast agent evolution window

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The acquisition uses periodic sampling patterns that alternately sample the central and peripheral k-space regions across multiple time points. This periodic action allows the system to accumulate 3D k-space coverage over time while staying within the limited contrast agent evolution window, effectively trading temporal sampling for spatial coverage in a controlled manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP4170373B1Computer-implemented method for determining a dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance data set, magnetic resonance imaging device, computer program and electronically readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.06.18 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • EP4170373B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4170373B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4170373B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Computer-implemented method for determining a dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance data set of an imaging region of a patient, wherein the k-space (1) to be acquired is divided into a central region (A) comprising the k-space center (4) and a peripheral region (B) surrounding the central region (A), and wherein the peripheral region (B) comprises a partitioning number of peripheral k-space portions (Bi), comprising the steps of - using a plurality of reception coils (18) to acquire magnetic resonance signals using parallel imaging and a k-space acquisition scheme, in which alternatingly the central region (A) and one of the peripheral k-space portions (Bi), the peripheral k-space portion (Bi) being chosen according to a pre-determined order, are imaged in acquisition steps of a pair, such that, after the partition number of such pairs, the whole k-space (1) to be acquired has been imaged and a sliding reconstruction window can be applied to reconstruct an additional magnetic resonance image (10, 11, 12) after each acquisition of such a pair, wherein during acquisition undersampling in at least two k-space directions is performed, - reconstructing a time series of magnetic resonance images (10, 11, 12) forming the magnetic resonance data set from the magnetic resonance signals and sensitivity information regarding the plurality of reception coils (18) by using the sliding reconstruction window and a reconstruction technique for undersampled magnetic resonance data, wherein the k-space trajectories for each acquisition step are chosen to allow controlled aliasing in all three spatial dimensions including the readout direction.