MRI Mapping With Multi-Submodel AI for Shorter Single-Scan Acquisition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing T1, T2, and T1rho mapping techniques in magnetic resonance imaging suffer from long scan times and motion artifacts, requiring separate scans and breath-holding, which increases patient discomfort and decreases imaging efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a trained machine learning model with multiple sub-models to process MR images, enabling simultaneous generation of T1, T2, and T1rho mapping images in a single scan, reducing the number of required images and scan time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If separate scans are performed for T1, T2, and T1rho mapping, then mapping accuracy is improved, but scan time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping accuracyVSAvoidscan time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate mapping scans (T1, T2, T1rho) into a single integrated scan sequence. The MRI scanner performs all three mapping acquisitions simultaneously by interleaving the pulse sequences, allowing the system to obtain all mapping data in one go rather than requiring three separate scans, thus reducing total scan time while maintaining mapping accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops a unified processing framework that can handle multiple types of mapping data (T1, T2, T1rho) through a single scan sequence. The machine learning model is trained to process diverse mapping types using a common architecture, enabling the system to perform multiple mapping functions simultaneously without requiring separate dedicated sequences for each mapping type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If extended scan duration is used for accurate mapping, then mapping quality is improved, but motion artifacts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping qualityVSAvoidmotion artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple mapping acquisitions into a single scan sequence, the patent ensures that all mapping data is collected within one breath-hold period. This eliminates the problem of patient motion between separate scans, as the entire mapping process completes before the patient needs to resume breathing, thereby reducing motion artifacts while maintaining mapping quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs all necessary mapping data acquisition within a single breath-hold period before any motion can occur. By completing the entire mapping sequence in advance, the system captures all required data while the patient is still in the same physiological state, preventing motion-related degradation of mapping quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If multiple separate scans are required, then comprehensive mapping data is obtained, but patient discomfort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive mapping dataVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges T1, T2, and T1rho mapping acquisitions into a single scan that can be completed within one breath-hold. This eliminates the need for patients to perform multiple separate breath-holds, reducing discomfort while ensuring all mapping data is comprehensively captured in one continuous acquisition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent collects all necessary mapping data during a single breath-hold period before the patient needs to resume breathing. By completing all data acquisition in advance, the system ensures comprehensive mapping information is obtained while minimizing the total time the patient must hold their breath, thereby improving comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If multiple separate scans are performed, then complete mapping information is acquired, but imaging efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping information completenessVSAvoidimaging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple mapping sequences into a single integrated scan that acquires T1, T2, and T1rho data simultaneously. This merging approach ensures complete mapping information is obtained while reducing the total scan time from what would be required for three separate scans, thereby improving imaging efficiency without sacrificing information completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal processing framework that handles multiple mapping types through a single scan sequence and unified machine learning model. This multi-functional approach allows the system to efficiently process diverse mapping data in one go, improving throughput and imaging efficiency while maintaining complete mapping information acquisition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260072111A1Methods and systems for magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 UIH AMERICA INC
  • US20260072111A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072111A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072111A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provides a method implemented on a computing device including at least one processor and a storage device. The method, may include obtaining magnetic resonance (MR) images of a subject, at least two of the MR images being acquired by an MRI scanner according to different imaging parameters. The method may also include obtaining one or more target MR mappings corresponding to at least a portion of the MR images by processing the MR images through a trained machine learning model. The second count of the target MR mappings may be less than a first count of the MR images. The trained machine learning model may include at least two sub-models, and each sub-model processes at least one of the MR images.