MRI Motion Correction Using Interleaved Scout Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing retrospective motion correction methods in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are computationally expensive and prone to convergence towards local minima due to large patient motion, especially when using parallel imaging techniques like SENSE+motion, which are not robust enough for clinical applications.

Innovation Solution

Incorporate multiple low-resolution scout images into the MRI sequence to improve the stability and robustness of retrospective motion correction by using these scout images to estimate and correct patient motion, thereby stabilizing the minimization process and reducing computational costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If retrospective motion correction methods are used to correct patient motion in MRI, then motion artefacts are reduced, but computational cost becomes excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion correction qualityVSAvoidcomputation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the motion correction process into two separate stages: (1) motion estimation using a simplified model, and (2) image reconstruction using the estimated motion parameters. This segmentation avoids the computationally expensive alternating optimization by decoupling motion estimation from image reconstruction, thereby reducing overall computational cost while maintaining correction quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs motion estimation as a preliminary step before final image reconstruction. By estimating motion parameters first using a simplified forward model and then applying these parameters in the reconstruction stage, the method avoids repeated updates during alternating optimization, significantly reducing computational burden while preserving motion correction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If alternating optimization is used to estimate motion and image parameters, then motion correction is achieved, but computation time becomes prohibitive for clinical use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion correction accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into distinct phases: motion estimation phase using a simplified model, and image reconstruction phase using the pre-estimated motion parameters. This eliminates the need for alternating updates between motion and image parameters, reducing computation time from hours to minutes while maintaining correction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Motion parameters are estimated in advance as a preliminary step before performing the final image reconstruction. This preliminary motion estimation allows the reconstruction stage to focus solely on image quality optimization with fixed motion parameters, avoiding the iterative back-and-forth updates of alternating optimization and dramatically reducing computation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If large patient motion occurs during scanning, then motion artefacts increase, but retrospective correction methods converge towards local minima

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion correction robustnessVSAvoidmotion estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used in motion estimation by employing a simplified forward model with fewer optimization variables compared to the full SENSE+motion model. This parameter simplification makes the optimization landscape more favorable, reducing the likelihood of converging to local minima even when large patient motion occurs, while still achieving accurate motion correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12605119B2Generating a motion-corrected magnetic resonance image dataset
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12605119B2 patent drawing
  • US12605119B2 patent drawing
  • US12605119B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a motion-corrected MR image dataset of a subject includes: acquiring k-space data of an MR image of a subject in an imaging sequence; acquiring at least two low-resolution scout images of the subject interleaved with the k-space data of the imaging sequence; comparing the scout images with one another in order to detect and/or to estimate subject motion between the scout images; and reconstructing a motion-corrected MR image dataset from the k-space data acquired in the imaging sequence. The reconstruction process includes: estimating the motion trajectory of the subject by comparing the k-space data with at least one of the low-resolution scout images; and estimating the motion-corrected image dataset using the estimated motion trajectory, wherein the estimations involve minimizing the data consistency error between the acquired k-space data and a forward model described by an encoding operator.