Parallel Imaging Parameter Optimization in MRI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 3D magnetic resonance imaging with parallel imaging, selecting appropriate acceleration factors and encoding directions is complex, often resulting in poor image quality due to incorrect choices, and involves a cumbersome setup prone to operator mistakes, with optimal selection requiring prior scans for noise information.

Innovation Solution

An automatic optimization system for parallel acceleration parameters that simplifies the selection of encoding directions and reduction factors based on quantifiable parameters, including minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), using coil sensitivity information and patient loading data from a conventional coil survey scan to optimize encoding directions and reduction factors, reducing the number of parameters to be selected and streamlining the user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual selection of acceleration factors and encoding directions is used, then operator control over scan parameters is maintained, but the system becomes complex and prone to operator mistakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of parameter selectionVSAvoidcomplexity of parameter setup
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal acceleration factors and encoding directions by utilizing coil sensitivity information and noise covariance data from the scan itself, eliminating the need for manual parameter selection and operator intervention in the complex setup process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs a preliminary survey scan to acquire coil sensitivity information and noise covariance data before the actual diagnostic scan, using this pre-acquired information to automatically optimize the acceleration parameters for the main scan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If multiple individual acceleration factors are selected for different encoding directions, then optimized parallel imaging performance can be achieved, but the setup becomes complicated and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan efficiencyVSAvoidtime for parameter configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines the optimal distribution of acceleration factors across different encoding directions by analyzing coil sensitivity information and noise covariance, eliminating the need for manual configuration of multiple individual acceleration factors and significantly reducing setup time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs a preliminary survey scan to acquire the necessary coil sensitivity and noise information, which is then used to automatically optimize the acceleration factor distribution for the main diagnostic scan, reducing configuration time for the actual imaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If incorrect acceleration factors are selected, then scan time is reduced, but image quality deteriorates due to low signal-to-noise ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan timeVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses noise covariance data acquired during the survey scan to predict the signal-to-noise ratio for different acceleration factor combinations, providing feedback to automatically select the optimal acceleration factors that maintain image quality while reducing scan time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the acceleration factors based on the specific coil configuration and noise characteristics detected during the survey scan, automatically optimizing the balance between scan time reduction and image quality for each specific imaging scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2972450B1Automatic optimization of parallel imaging acceleration parameters
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP2972450B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2972450B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2972450B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A parallel magnetic resonance imaging system (1) includes at least one radio frequency (RF) coil (10, 12) with a plurality of coil elements, a smart select unit (24), a parallel imaging parameter unit (28), and a sequence control (16). The smart select unit (24), from a pre-scan or prior scan of a subject with the at least one RF coil, constructs (60) a signal map and a plurality of noise maps based on different sets of reduction factors. The parallel imaging parameter unit (28) selects a set of reduction factors corresponding to a noise map which includes a highest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The sequence control (16) performs a magnetic resonance imaging scan of the subject based on the selected reduction factors.