MRI Protocol Sequencing to Reduce Hardware Strain and Patient Discomfort

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems face hardware strain and patient interaction issues due to sequences with large-gradient waveforms and B1+ magnetic fields, leading to scanner failures and patient discomfort, with existing automatic protocols failing to adequately address these challenges.

Innovation Solution

An automatic protocolling system that intelligently orders MRI sequences to reduce hardware and patient interactions by spacing out high-interacting sequences with low-interacting ones, using artificial intelligence to select pulse sequence parameters and dynamically reorder protocols to minimize noise, heat, and acoustic energy, thereby reducing scan time and improving patient experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple sequences with large-gradient waveforms are run repeatedly, then imaging productivity is improved, but hardware reliability deteriorates due to gradient cooling system strain and magnet interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging productivityVSAvoidhardware reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic cooling intervals between high-gradient sequences, inserting low-gradient sequences to allow gradient cooling system recovery. This periodic action prevents continuous strain on the gradient cooling system while maintaining imaging productivity through efficient sequence scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of sequence hardware interactions and pre-calculates optimal sequencing that distributes high-gradient sequences with adequate spacing. This preliminary planning prevents hardware overload before it occurs, ensuring both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If sequences with large B1+ magnetic fields are used, then imaging speed is improved, but patient safety deteriorates due to transmit-coil heating and implant heating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging speedVSAvoidpatient safety
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system alternates between high B1+ sequences and low B1+ sequences, providing periodic intervals that allow transmit-coil cooling and reduce cumulative heating. This maintains imaging speed while preventing excessive temperature rise in the coil and patient tissues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts B1+ field parameters by selecting sequences with varying B1+ levels based on real-time thermal conditions and patient safety constraints. This parameter variation optimizes the balance between imaging speed and patient safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If high-acoustic-energy sequences are run continuously, then imaging productivity is improved, but patient comfort deteriorates due to excessive noise exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging productivityVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system schedules high-acoustic-energy sequences periodically with intervals of low-acoustic-energy sequences, allowing patient auditory system recovery. This maintains productivity while reducing cumulative noise exposure and improving patient comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If sequences are spaced out to reduce hardware interactions, then hardware reliability is improved, but scan time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware reliabilityVSAvoidscan time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates optimal sequence spacing that achieves minimum cooling intervals while maximizing imaging productivity. This preliminary optimization ensures adequate hardware cooling without unnecessary scan time extension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts sequence timing parameters and spacing based on real-time hardware temperature feedback, optimizing the balance between reliability and scan time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11624794B2Automatic protocolling to reduce system and patient interactions
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 SYNAPTIVE MEDICAL INC
  • US11624794B2 patent drawing
  • US11624794B2 patent drawing
  • US11624794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic protocolling system and methods involving a processor operable by way of a set of executable instructions storable in relation to a nontransient memory device, the set of executable instructions configuring the processor to: receive information relating to an initial protocol comprising an initial ordering of a plurality of sequences, the information comprising data relating to an interaction extent value of at least one of an imaging system and a patient as a function of time corresponding to each sequence in the plurality of sequences, the data relating to a time-integrated effect of each sequence in the plurality of sequences; and dynamically determine an alternative protocol comprising an alternative ordering of the plurality of sequences based on the time-integrated effect, whereby an alternative protocol is provided.