MRI Apparatus Pulse Sequence Selection for Image Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques face challenges in maintaining consistent image quality due to subject motion, particularly during breathing, leading to variable results that depend heavily on the technician's skill, necessitating reattempts and potentially differing imaging outcomes.

Innovation Solution

An MRI apparatus equipped with processing circuitry that collects and analyzes magnetic resonance data to determine image quality, selecting a re-collection pulse sequence with differing types or conditions if initial image quality does not meet criteria, utilizing machine learning to generate a trained model for optimizing pulse sequence selection and reducing technician dependence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a technician manually judges and reattempts imaging when image quality is insufficient, then imaging can be corrected, but the results vary greatly depending on technician skill level

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistencyVSAvoidtechnician skill dependence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging apparatus automatically determines image quality and selects re-collection pulse sequences without technician intervention. The processing circuitry evaluates image quality metrics and autonomously decides whether re-imaging is needed, eliminating technician skill dependence while maintaining reliable image quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where image quality is continuously monitored and evaluated. When quality thresholds are not met, the system automatically triggers re-collection with adjusted parameters, creating a closed-loop control system that ensures consistent image quality regardless of technician expertise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the same pulse sequence is used for re-attempt imaging, then the imaging process is simple, but failure is likely if the subject's body motion occurred during initial imaging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging efficiencyVSAvoidimage quality success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts pulse sequence parameters based on the cause of imaging failure. When body motion is detected as the reason for poor image quality, the processing circuitry automatically selects different imaging conditions or sequences suited for motion compensation, rather than statically repeating the same sequence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes imaging parameters such as pulse sequence type, timing, or acquisition conditions when re-attempting imaging. This parameter adaptation increases the likelihood of successful image acquisition by matching the re-collection settings to the specific conditions that caused the initial failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple re-attempts are performed with different pulse sequences, then image quality can be improved, but imaging time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidimaging time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of image quality immediately after acquisition. By quickly assessing whether the image meets quality thresholds, the system determines early whether re-collection is needed, avoiding unnecessary delays when images are acceptable and enabling targeted re-attempts only when necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies re-collection only to specific imaging sequences or regions that failed quality checks, rather than re-attempting all imaging. This selective approach maintains high image quality standards while minimizing overall imaging time by focusing resources only where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables consistent and high-quality MR imaging by automatically selecting appropriate pulse sequences, reducing variability and reliance on technician expertise, thereby improving imaging efficiency and consistency.

Implementation Method 1

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques face challenges

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance: Nuclear Fusion

Data Source

PatentUS11129542B2Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 CANON MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US11129542B2 patent drawing
  • US11129542B2 patent drawing
  • US11129542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus includes processing circuitry. The processing circuitry collects magnetic resonance data in accordance with a pulse sequence. The processing circuitry determines image quality based on the magnetic resonance data. The processing circuitry selects a re-collection pulse sequence when it is determined that the image quality does not satisfy criteria, the re-collection pulse sequence having at least one of a type of sequence or an imaging condition differing from that of the pulse sequence.