MRI Re-Measurement Control Based on K-Space Position and Continuity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MRI techniques prolong imaging time by repeatedly re-measuring body movement-affected data, leading to inefficiencies due to inadequate determination criteria for re-measurement based on body movement magnitude and k-space position.

Innovation Solution

An MRI apparatus with a body movement processing unit that analyzes body movement-affected data in k-space, determining re-measurement necessity based on position and continuity, optimizing processing to minimize re-measurement frequency and time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If body movement-affected data is excluded or re-measured while maintaining image quality, then image quality is preserved, but imaging time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidimaging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating treatment based on the position of body movement-affected data within k-space. High-frequency region data is handled differently from low-frequency region data, with selective re-measurement criteria applied only where necessary to maintain image quality while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of determination criteria from simple magnitude-based thresholds to a composite criterion incorporating both magnitude and position (k-space region) of body movement-affected data, enabling more precise identification of when re-measurement is actually necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If re-measurement is performed repeatedly based on body movement magnitude and k-space position, then image quality is maintained, but imaging time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidimaging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of body movement characteristics and k-space data positioning before executing re-measurement. By pre-determining whether re-measurement is necessary based on the combination of movement magnitude and data position, the system avoids unnecessary re-measurement steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where body movement detection continuously monitors movement characteristics, and the processing unit uses this feedback to dynamically determine whether re-measurement is necessary, adjusting the measurement process in real-time rather than following a fixed repeated measurement protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If determination of re-measurement necessity is made after collection of measurement data of certain proportion, then data collection is completed, but re-measurement is performed unnecessarily extending imaging time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement data collectionVSAvoidimaging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic determination criteria that adjust during data collection based on real-time body movement detection. Rather than waiting for a fixed proportion of data to be collected before making determination, the system continuously evaluates movement characteristics against the refined criterion (magnitude + position) to dynamically decide on re-measurement necessity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces imaging time while maintaining image quality by minimizing unnecessary re-measurements through precise determination criteria for body movement-affected data in k-space.

Implementation Method 1

imaging is performed by repeatedly applying a radio-frequency magnetic field pulse and a gradient magnetic field pulse according to a predetermined pulse sequence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

an imaging unit that collects nuclear magnetic resonance signals of a subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNuclear magnetic resonance: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS20260056275A1Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and method of controlling the same
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US20260056275A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056275A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056275A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention aims to, in a case where measurement data affected by a body movement that occurred during an examination is re-measured, reduce a time extension caused by the re-measurement.Whether or not re-measurement is necessary is determined in consideration of continuity of measurement data affected by a body movement. In addition, in a case of performing the re-measurement, measurement of a part of unmeasured measurement data is omitted in consideration of a measurement time (number of phase encoding steps) of the measurement data to be re-measured.