MRI Scanning-Condition Recalculation for FOV Adjustments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems face challenges in maintaining a constant Signal-to-Noise (SN) ratio when adjusting the Field Of View (FOV) for varying subject sizes, requiring skilled operators and increasing examination time due to the complexity of determining necessary parameter changes.

Innovation Solution

An MRI apparatus with a scanning-condition recalculating unit that adjusts other scanning parameters to maintain or exceed the original SN ratio when the FOV is changed, including algorithms to recalculate parameters based on FOV changes in readout, phase encoding, and slice directions, ensuring stable image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the FOV is adjusted manually by an operator to match subject size, then the imaging coverage is optimized, but the operation becomes time-consuming and requires skilled expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFOV adjustment to subject sizeVSAvoidexamination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically measures the subject size using the positioning device and autonomously calculates the appropriate FOV and scanning parameters without requiring manual intervention or skilled operator expertise, thereby reducing examination time while maintaining adaptability to different subject sizes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes scanning parameters (FOV, matrix size, voxel dimensions) based on the measured subject size to maintain optimal imaging conditions, eliminating the need for manual parameter adjustment and reducing the time required for setup

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the FOV is changed to match subject size, then the imaging coverage is optimized, but the SN ratio changes and requires manual parameter correction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFOV adjustment to subject sizeVSAvoidparameter correction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically calculates and applies the necessary parameter corrections to maintain constant SN ratio when FOV changes, eliminating the need for manual correction by the operator. The recalculation unit autonomously determines the appropriate scanning parameters based on the measured subject size and desired SN ratio

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the positioning device measurements to automatically adjust scanning parameters. The measured subject size feeds back into the recalculation unit, which then determines the appropriate FOV and other parameters to maintain constant SN ratio, creating a closed-loop system that eliminates manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If default scanning conditions are used for all subjects, then the operation is simplified, but the SN ratio becomes unstable due to size variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning condition settingVSAvoidSN ratio stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static default scanning conditions to dynamic parameter adjustment. The scanning parameters are automatically adjusted in real-time based on the measured subject size, allowing the system to adapt to different subject dimensions while maintaining stable SN ratio and image quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes scanning parameters (FOV, matrix size, voxel dimensions, and other related parameters) based on the measured subject size to maintain optimal imaging conditions and stable SN ratio across different subject dimensions, eliminating the need for manual parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If manual FOV adjustment is performed to avoid aliasing, then the imaging accuracy is improved, but the examination time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging accuracyVSAvoidexamination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically measures subject size using the positioning device and autonomously calculates the appropriate FOV to prevent aliasing, eliminating the need for manual measurement and adjustment. This automated approach maintains imaging accuracy while significantly reducing the time required for setup

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the subject size using the positioning device before the actual scanning begins. Based on this pre-measurement, the system pre-calculates the appropriate FOV and scanning parameters, allowing the scanner to start immediately without time-consuming manual adjustment during the examination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Automatically maintains a consistent SN ratio during FOV adjustments, simplifying the process for operators and reducing examination time, even for inexperienced users, by recalculating and notifying the necessary scanning conditions.

Implementation Method 1

A magnetic resonance imaging method used by a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus is a method of acquiring chemical and physical microscopic information about a substance by using a magnetic resonance phenomenon. The magnetic resonance phenomenon is a phenomenon that when being placed in a magnetic field, an aggregation of subject nuclear spins resonates with a radio-frequency magnetic field in which each atomic nucleus spins at a particular frequency (resonance frequency) responding to its own unique magnetic moment and an existing magnetic field, and generates a signal (magnetic resonance signal) in a relaxation process.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance phenomenon: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS8008918B2Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and scanning-condition setting method
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US8008918B2 patent drawing
  • US8008918B2 patent drawing
  • US8008918B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Signal-to-Noise (SN) ratio maintained scanning-condition recalculating unit re-sets a value of a scanning parameter other than an SN ratio included in scanning conditions when the size of a Field Of View (FOV) to be set for a scan is changed, so as to make the SN ratio of an image to be taken under after-change scanning conditions equal to or larger than the SN ratio of an image assumed to be taken under before-change scanning conditions. A scanning-condition edit/scan positioning unit then sets scanning conditions based on the value of the scanning parameter recalculated by the scanning-condition recalculating unit.